City Council candidate · City of Lake Oswego · November 3, 2026
Bryan Guiney
HUD Oregon field-office director; former Marine officer and state development official.
Reach the campaign
- bryanguiney.com (opens in a new tab)
- info@bryanguiney.com
- Volunteer form (opens in a new tab)
- Instagram (opens in a new tab)
- Facebook (opens in a new tab)
As published in their pamphlet statement and campaign site.
In their words
Said: Public service is my life’s work. In the Marines, at the State, and in the Federal government, I’ve spent my career bringing people together, managing public resources, solving problems, and delivering results.
Pamphlet p. 29
Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; extracted September 21, 2026
Clackamas County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 29 ↗Skipped the “Community Service:” header field; the first sentence is under 12 words, so two are given. Verbatim opening of the candidate's own statement; publication by the county does not verify the claims.
The verbatim opening of their voters’ pamphlet statement, the same rule for every candidate. We chose nothing.
What they say they would do
Our summary of their platform, in our wordsEmphasizes fiscal discipline, sustainable growth, business activity and infrastructure.
- Improve mobility, traffic safety and connectivity.
- Support commercial districts.
- Make city administration responsive and transparent.
Our reading
Our interpretation, not their wordsHe offers public-finance experience as the tool for balancing growth against service costs; which projects come first and what limits would bind them are not yet named.
Where they stand
Rent and homes
Density in centers- What
- Said: Would meet the need for more housing by focusing density in centers and corridors rather than uniformly across established neighborhoods.
- How
- Said: Adaptive reuse and mixed-use redevelopment where older office inventory is struggling; density directed to centers and corridors.
- Measured by
- Not in their sources
Camps, crime and who responds
Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.
Your bills and taxes
Budget in the black- What
- Said: Would keep the budget balanced with long-range financial planning and controlled project scope as infrastructure costs rise, without promises the city cannot afford.
- How
- Said: Clear priorities, controlled project scope and costs, and aligned funding sources for long-term capital investments.
- Measured by
- Not in their sources
Streets, buses and air
Mobility, clean energy- What
- Said: Would invest in infrastructure and mobility to improve traffic, safety and connectivity, with clean energy and environmental stewardship built into major decisions.
- How
- Not in their sources
- Measured by
- Not in their sources
The choices this office faces
Every candidate in this race is asked the same 6 questions. Bryan Guiney is on record on 5, with 1 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.
No answer we could findBuild a new 50,000–70,000-square-foot library on a larger west-side site and sell the current one, or repair the 1983 building?
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.
Raise sewer bills 28% at once in July 2027, or 8% a year for ten years, to pay for the $370 million wastewater plant?
Said: Points to the new wastewater plant as an example of a long-term project with benefits and says the city has little deferred maintenance; whether to raise sewer bills 28% at once or 8% a year is unsaid.
On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.
Where should Lake Oswego put the 4,850 homes the state now expects: rezoned office land like Kruse Way and Foothills, or also inside single-family neighborhoods?
Said: Says density belongs in centers and corridors, “not imposed uniformly across established neighborhoods,” and backs reuse of struggling office land; as a planning commissioner voted December 8, 2025 to recommend the Kruse Way office-to-housing rezoning, 7–0.
Keep the new rule that new homes retain 45% of large trees or pay $300–$400 an inch?
Said: As a planning commissioner voted June 8 and June 22, 2026 to recommend the clear-and-objective tree rules, saying he did not want the city drawn into neighborhood disputes over dead trees; the fee amounts set in September are unsaid.
Give the North Anchor developer until March 2027 to finance an 88-room hotel, or pivot that downtown parcel to another use?
Said: Wants major projects including North Anchor and Foothills to move forward; whether to hold the developer to the March 2027 hotel deadline or pivot the parcel is unsaid.
On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.
Fund the next five school-pathway projects, about $3.75–4.5 million, including two the First Addition neighborhood opposed?
Said: Says many of the city’s large thoroughfares lack sidewalks, which directly affects how children get to school, and would invest in mobility and connectivity; the five recommended projects are unsaid.
On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.
A question the evidence leaves open
Which infrastructure projects would you prioritize, and what financial limits would guide them?
Sources (3)
- Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 46Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 18, 2026Written by the candidate or campaign. Publication by the county does not verify the claims.
- Clackamas County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 29Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 21, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.
- Guiney · prioritiesCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 21, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.