Skip to content

Print edition · Portland City Council · November 3, 2026

Portland City Auditor

1 candidates · Ranked choice · one seat · Research reviewed September 18, 2026 · Lines edition 2026-09-19.1

Official list checked. Candidates appear alphabetically by displayed name and receive the same structure. We do not endorse, rank or score.

Our reading

One candidate appears on the city’s checked register. Even uncontested, the office’s choices matter: which audits come first, whether recommendations get done, and how the auditor keeps independence from the bureaus it reviews.

Draft; human review pending.

Said
A campaign statement, in our summary or their words.
Voted
A recorded Council roll call.
Not found
Not in the sources we reviewed. A research gap, not a position.
Yes No
The vote as the word, never as color alone.
Absent
Missed that roll call.
Not on committee
Had no vote in that committee.
NameRoleSummaryRent and homesCamps, crime and who respondsYour bills and taxesStreets, buses and air
Simone RedeIncumbent city auditorEmphasizes independent oversight, service outcomes and the effective use of tax dollars.not found in the sources we reviewedWants 911 call wait-time improvements sustained.Wants independent audits that ensure effective use of tax dollars.Wants the city held to its climate commitments through audit follow-up.

Summaries are our one-line readings of what each candidate says. Issue lines are short forms of the positions in each brief, AI-drafted and awaiting human review; “—” means not found in the sources we reviewed.

No candidate in this race sits on Council today.

Not foundNo featured votes are selected for this race yet.

Simone Rede

City Auditor candidate · City of Portland · November 3, 2026

Simone Rede

Incumbent city auditor; government performance auditor.

Photo: Candidate-submitted photo · 2026 Multnomah voters’ pamphlet

In their words

Said: Portland deserves an auditor who sees the promise of our people and our city and will use the office to get the best possible outcomes for all of us.

Pamphlet p. 52

Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; extracted September 21, 2026

Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 52 ↗

Verbatim opening of the candidate's own statement; publication by the county does not verify the claims.

The verbatim opening of their voters’ pamphlet statement, the same rule for every candidate. We chose nothing.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Emphasizes independent oversight, service outcomes and the effective use of tax dollars.

  • Scrutinize emergency-response performance and climate commitments.
  • Track public-asset maintenance and arts spending.
  • Apply professional auditing standards independently.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Independent oversight
  • Tax-dollar effectiveness

Audits can identify problems and track recommendations but do not implement bureau fixes; her case rests on follow-through she credits to her first term.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

Camps, crime and who responds

Sustain 911 gains
What
Said: Sustain the improvements to 911 call wait times that she says her office’s work helped produce.
How
Said: Select audit topics Portlanders raise, such as gun violence, and follow up on recommendations; she cites releasing the first city audit of the Joint Office of Homeless Services.
Measured by
Not in their sources

Your bills and taxes

Independent audits
What
Said: Apply professional auditing standards independently to ensure fair opportunities and effective use of tax dollars; she cites strengthening oversight of the Arts Access Fund and calling attention to roads, parks and asset-maintenance backlogs.
How
Said: Keep distance from the bureaus under review and control over the office’s own budget and decisions; she cites proposing a city transparency-advocate position.
Measured by
Not in their sources

Streets, buses and air

Audit climate promises
What
Said: Ensure the city follows through on its climate commitments, an audit area she says she chose because Portlanders raised it.
How
Not in their sources
Measured by
Not in their sources

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 4 questions. Simone Rede is on record on 4. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

On record
  • Which city programs should the auditor’s nine performance auditors examine this year?

    Said: Chose the FY 2026–27 schedule herself on June 18, 2026: Portland Solutions, citywide equity, fund management, cybersecurity, Prosper Portland grants, gun-violence prevention, emergency management, police body-worn cameras and utility rates, one fewer topic after cutting an auditor position.

  • Should the Auditor’s Office take the same budget cut as the rest of the city?

    Said: Asked the mayor in March 2026 to hold her office’s cut to 3% while citywide cuts of up to 10% were weighed, writing that transparency and accountability are not optional; her own requested budget cut one performance auditor.

  • Stand by the Elections Division’s ruling that the community-safety initiative fell short of the ballot?

    Said: Said July 29, 2026 that “independent election administration cannot bend to political pressure — from petitioners, opponents, or elected officials,” and that her division administers elections with integrity and by the law.

  • Take on investigations the City Council asks for, as it did over Zenith Energy?

    Said: Declined the Council’s March 2025 Zenith request, writing it was unclear how a report on past land-use decisions “will remedy harm or result in fairer treatment,” and pointed to the Council’s own powers or a performance audit.

Compare every candidate

A question the evidence leaves open

Which unresolved audit recommendations would you prioritize in the next term?

Sources (4)

  1. Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 52Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 18, 2026Written by the candidate or campaign. Publication by the county does not verify the claims.
  2. Rede · campaign homeCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 21, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.
  3. Rede · aboutCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 21, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.
  4. Rede · valuesCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 21, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.