Skip to content
Guy Frankenstein

District 3 candidate · Portland City Council · November 3, 2026

Guy Frankenstein

Human-rights graduate student; background in auto insurance.

Reach the campaign

No pamphlet statement or City filing among his sources, and the Mercury questionnaire lists no website, email or phone. The guyfrankenstein.com domain serves a placeholder page (“Website under deconstruction”) with a personal address and no campaign identification, so it is not treated as a campaign channel.

In their words

Said: Federal agents of a fascist state patrol our streets, gas our neighbors, and terrorize our immigrant community, while City Council and state government offer empty words accompanied by zero action.

Questionnaire

Candidate statement · September 9, 2026; extracted September 20, 2026

Mercury questionnaire · Frankenstein’s responses ↗

Verbatim opening of the candidate's written questionnaire response as quoted by the Portland Mercury; the paper's comma before its attribution is rendered as the sentence's period. No pamphlet statement; no statement in a City filing among the published sources; the campaign site guyfrankenstein.com showed only “Website under deconstruction.” on September 20, 2026.

No pamphlet statement was published; this is the verbatim opening of their written questionnaire answer.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Describes himself as a democratic socialist and calls for confrontational opposition to ICE and large corporations.

  • Remove ICE agents from Portland.
  • Seek larger contributions from billion-dollar companies.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Redistribution
  • Opposition to ICE

His responses identify who he wants city government to challenge. They do not establish which city powers, budget changes or legal mechanisms would deliver those goals.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

Camps, crime and who responds

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

Your bills and taxes

Large companies pay more
What
Said: Calls for larger contributions from billion-dollar companies. A particular tax instrument or projected revenue is not established in the reviewed response.
How
Not in their sources
Measured by
Not in their sources

Streets, buses and air

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 8 questions. Guy Frankenstein is on record on 1, with 7 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

No answer we could find
  • Public money and terms for renovating the Moda Center?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Hire more sworn officers, or invest first elsewhere?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep funding camp removals at current levels?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Restrict new AI data centers in the city?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Expand Portland Street Response to a full 24/7 role?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep the monthly street repair fee?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Raise water bills to pay for the Bull Run filtration plant and system repairs?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

On record
  • Raise new revenue, or hold the line on taxes and fees?

    Said: Says he would “bleed every billion dollar company operating within this city”; no instrument or amount is named.

Compare every candidate

Council votes

No Council vote yet. That is not a judgment about experience.

A question the evidence leaves open

What specific city legislation would implement these goals?

Sources (1)

  1. Mercury questionnaire · Frankenstein’s responsesCandidate statement · September 9, 2026Candidate responses within reporting; the publisher’s characterizations are not adopted as facts.