Portland City Council · November 3, 2026
Portland City Council, District 3
- 21
- Candidates
- 3
- Seats
- 6
- Rank up to
- Nov 3
- Due 8 p.m.
Fundraising facts and comparison ↓
Southeast and inner Northeast: Buckman, Kerns, Hosford-Abernethy, Richmond, Sunnyside, Mt. Tabor, Laurelhurst, Rose City Park, Roseway, Montavilla, Brooklyn, Creston-Kenilworth, Foster-Powell, Mt. Scott-Arleta, Woodstock and Brentwood-Darlington.Southeast and inner NortheastNot yours? District 4
Our readingDraft
Candidates differ on how far to rely on faster permits for private builders versus public and social housing, on the mix of police and unarmed responders, and on how far to lean on taxes and utility bills versus trimming services. Many propose some of each.
| Candidate | 15 of 21 documented | 18 of 21 documented | 20 of 21 documented | 15 of 21 documented | Save to my ballot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerFiling statement only | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets | |
![]() | Homes | Safety | Money | Streets |
What this office decides right now
Decisions ahead
A district councilor is one of twelve under the 2025 charter: four districts, three seats each, a Council that passes the budget, ordinances and resolutions while the mayor and city administrator run the bureaus. District 3 covers inner Southeast and a slice of inner Northeast, from Buckman and Kerns to Montavilla and Woodstock. The 2024 winners here drew two-year terms; this election fills four-year seats, so the next three councilors vote on four budgets in a City that spends $8.55 billion a year with about $803 million of it discretionary.
Each of this office’s 9 live choices is a board below, with every candidate’s stated position or the gap.
Next budget gap
Council balanced the $8.55 billion FY 2026–27 budget (about $803.4 million of it discretionary) against a $170 million General Fund gap with roughly 140 positions cut, $47 million from reserves and contingency and $27 million of Clean Energy Fund interest. A September 2026 workgroup report before Council on September 23 finds citywide assessed value growth below 2.2% for two years running and personnel at about 70% of ongoing General Fund bureau costs, and recommends biennial budgets, a defined list of core services and a new revenue strategy.
Housing
Resolution 37746 (12–0, April 15, 2026) set a goal of Council consideration by June 30, 2027 of zoning for more apartments and mixed-use buildings in the inner east side, from NE Fremont Street to SE Powell Boulevard; the planners’ schedule puts it before Council in 2028. Portland’s 2016 housing bond and its share of Metro’s 2018 bond are fully committed, and the City’s housing plan sets 2027 for a replacement source. A social housing study reached Council on August 31, 2026, and the Housing Bureau is evaluating renter protections, including relocation payments.
Moda Center deal
Resolution 37750 (8–4, August 12, 2026) approved a non-binding term sheet for a roughly $500 million arena renovation with a $573 million public budget: up to $365 million in state bonds, $120 million from the City “from sources yet to be confirmed” and $88 million from the county, plus $275 million in City payments over 20 years from the ticket- and parking-funded Spectator Venues fund. Definitive agreements are due before Council by December 31, 2026.
Camping and removals
City code bars camping on public property when reasonable shelter is available and restricts how people may camp; the Impact Reduction Program removed 7,480 campsites in FY 2025–26 on 105,180 reports, with removal costs of $8.52 million. A November 2025 amendment to move about $4.3 million from removals to services drew five votes and needed seven, and the City expects 580 adult overnight shelter beds this winter, down from 876.
Shelter in District 3
The district holds the 160-unit Clinton Triangle alternative shelter at 1490 SE Gideon St (205 people) and 220 recovery-oriented overnight beds at two shelters on SE Grand Avenue, all listed as open in the City’s FY 2026–27 shelter plan. Citywide, the City expects capacity for 718 people at its 24/7 and alternative sites this year against 867 last year, after the budget cut shelter services by $18 million (31%).
Street Response
Portland Street Response runs on about $10 million a year with 52 staff, answering calls seven days a week but not around the clock; it took 15,353 calls in 2025, and 6% needed police or ambulance co-response. Council’s June 2025 resolution (10–2) made it an integrated branch of first response dispatched through 911, and the FY 2026–27 budget restored four peer-support positions ($659,274) the proposed budget had cut.
Street fee, water bills
A street repair fee passed 9–3 in April 2026 adds $12 a month for a single-family home and $8.40 per apartment unit from January 1, 2027, an estimated $46 million a year with 75% for maintenance; the May 2026 water ordinance (8–4) raised the typical monthly water charge from $65.57 to $70.89. Water bills carry the Bull Run filtration project, whose budget rose about $450 million in February 2026 to $2.56 billion ($2.58 billion program-wide after the FY 2026–27 budget), with the state deadline moved to September 2029.
Police staffing
The June 2026 staffing report Council requested (7–5) counts 877 authorized sworn positions, about 89 of them ($11.7 million) unfunded within a roughly $320 million budget, and high-priority response times averaging 20.4 minutes in FY 2024–25 against 7.5 in FY 2015–16. Growing the sworn ranks at current hiring rates would cost about $37.3 million a year more by FY 2035–36, before an estimated $338 million in facilities.
Data centers
Resolution 37753 (11–0, September 16, 2026) asks the City Administrator not to sign data-center non-disclosure agreements, to notify Council of any inquiry for a facility drawing 20 megawatts or more, and states Council’s intent to pursue a moratorium or zoning limits on hyperscale data centers. Any actual restriction needs a code change and a further vote; the resolution notes data centers now use 5.6% of Oregon’s electricity.
Where they stand · nine more choices
Nine choices this Council has faced
One question at a time: every candidate’s answer, A–Z, with its source. Open a topic to compare the answers and see where information is still missing.
Inner Eastside zoningRezone the inner east side to allow apartment buildings off the main streets (the Inner Eastside Zoning Project)?10 of 21 on record
Resolution 37746, which set a goal of Council consideration by June 30, 2027, passed 12–0 on April 15, 2026 with every sitting councilor voting yes; planners schedule the zoning vote for 2028, and no draft zoning exists yet. The study area runs from NE Fremont Street to SE Powell Boulevard.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Yes, after learning moreSaid: What they said
Said yes, particularly if the goal is more housing, adding that he needs to understand the program better before forming a strong opinion on all of it.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Yes, co-sponsored timelineSaid: What they said
Will vote yes. She co-sponsored Resolution 37746, which set the project’s accelerated timeline, and says off-corridor apartments near transit are the textbook answer to the housing crisis.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
Yes, with resident roleSaid: What they said
Supports re-legalizing apartments on residential streets and moving the project forward; would vote for a plan that adds substantial capacity, lets displaced residents return, and gives renters, families and small businesses a meaningful role.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerNot found
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
Yes, then expand itSaid: What they said
Would vote to approve the project and then focus on expanding it around what she calls a “Holistic Zoning” plan.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
Yes, courtyard apartmentsSaid: What they said
Yes; the apartments should be built with inner courtyards and playgrounds for children.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
Will vote yesSaid: What they said
Supports the project’s goals and re-legalizing multi-family apartments, and will vote to approve the Inner Eastside Zoning Project.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Yes, appropriately scaledSaid: What they said
Supports re-legalizing “appropriately scaled” apartments throughout inner Portland and would support the Inner Eastside Zoning Project.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
Depends on timelineSaid: What they said
Sees long-term benefits in more multifamily housing and rezoning parts of the inner east side, but has reservations about the expedited timeline; her answer depends on completed risk assessments and an informed say for each neighborhood.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
Needs long studySaid: What they said
Calls the question vague and is open to a policy that weighs every factor, but says a project of this scale needs deep investigation and long debate to avoid losses the city could not recover from.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Yes to bothSaid: What they said
Yes to re-legalizing apartments and to the project: the inner east side should be accessible to the working class, which means housing for more than homeowners, with apartments and transit everywhere in the city.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
Moda Center dealPublic money and terms for renovating the Moda Center?13 of 21 on record
Council approved negotiating terms in August and a joint City–County–State oversight body on October 21. These steps did not themselves approve the final lease or City funding.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Deals must benefit residentsSaid: What they said
Calls the packages the city offered a billionaire while cutting funds a lack of courage; would fight for deals where citizens and communities really benefit.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Angelita Morillo: NoNot on taxpayers’ tabRecorded vote
Voted no on Approve the Moda negotiating framework
Said: What they said
Says she demanded transparency on proposed Moda Center changes and pushed back on taxpayers footing that bill.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
Metro and private moneySaid: What they said
Supports renovating the Moda Center and keeping the Blazers, but before Portland fills the remaining gap would explore a Metro investment or ownership role and private philanthropy, sponsorship and naming rights to cut Portland taxpayers’ share.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerNot found
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
Only with guaranteed returnSaid: What they said
Calls the current proposal opaque; would require union local contractors, no Clean Energy Fund money, a larger ticket share, a significant rent and a guaranteed net return.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Nothing without team commitmentSaid: What they said
Says that if the new Blazers ownership will not commit to keeping the team in Portland, the city need not commit anything to them in return.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
No money for BlazersSaid: What they said
Says the Blazers are leaving regardless and any money spent to keep them is money Portland will need later.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
Explore arena transferSaid: What they said
Wants the Blazers kept but opposes spending hundreds of millions in public money on the Moda Center, which the City acquired for $1 in 2024; would explore giving it to the team’s new owner for an ironclad 20-year commitment.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
No PCEF for ModaSaid: What they said
Told 350PDX the Moda Center is not within the Clean Energy Fund’s mandate and proposes covering the arena and parking structures with solar and wind; his statement does not say whether other public money should pay.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
No Moda renovationsSaid: What they said
States flatly: no renovations on the Moda Center, none.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Fair deal, keep BlazersSaid: What they said
Wants a deal that keeps the Blazers long-term while protecting taxpayers; calls for good-faith, transparent negotiation.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Steve Novick: YesFair deal, break evenRecorded vote
Voted yes on Approve the Moda negotiating framework
Said: What they said
Wants to keep the Blazers and says he is fighting for a fair deal in which the city gets as much money out of the Moda Center as it puts in.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Tiffany Koyama Lane: NoFair deal for PortlandersRecorded vote
Voted no on Approve the Moda negotiating framework
Said: What they said
Says she fought for a fair deal for Portlanders in the Moda Center negotiations; the statement does not say how much public money the renovation should get.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
No on term sheetSaid: What they said
Says he would have voted no on the Moda term sheet: he wants the Blazers kept but says the City started from a weak position and should have secured a clear return, accountability and remedies.
New taxes or feesWhen, if ever, would they raise taxes or fees?17 of 21 on record
Recent votes raised water rates and created a street repair fee; candidates differ on whether households or large companies should pay more.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Hold line until provenSaid: What they said
Would generally hold the line on new taxes and fees until the city shows existing revenue is spent efficiently; any new source needs a clear purpose, a sunset or review, and accountability.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Small ride-hail feeSaid: What they said
Says she secured new funding for potholes and streetlights with a small fee on Uber and Lyft rides.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
Wealthy first, if neededSaid: What they said
Says working households and small businesses should not be the automatic first source; when revenue is needed, asks more of the wealthiest households and largest corporations.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerNot found
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
Corporate vacancy taxesSaid: What they said
Proposes residential and commercial vacancy taxes on large corporate owners, a higher Clean Energy Fund surcharge and a shift to land-value taxation.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Billion-dollar companies paySaid: What they said
Says he would “bleed every billion dollar company operating within this city”; no instrument or amount is named.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
Cost-benefit before taxesSaid: What they said
Would demand honest cost-benefit accounting before raising taxes or expanding programs, citing outmigration of high earners.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Tax billionairesSaid: What they said
His pamphlet values list includes taxing billionaires “to hell and back”; no instrument is named.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
Hold the lineSaid: What they said
Says his priority is to hold the line on new taxes and fees.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Existing tools firstSaid: What they said
For the lowest-income housing she would combine bond money, tax increment financing, construction excise tax revenue, public land and state and federal programs, and move unspent housing dollars; she names no new tax or fee.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
No new taxes, feesSaid: What they said
Says the answer to the lowest-income housing need does not lie in raising taxes and fees on land and business owners or utility rates, pointing instead to accountability for programs and tens of millions in unspent housing funds.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
Cut most local taxesSaid: What they said
Would eliminate the Arts Tax, gas tax, lodging tax, heavy-vehicle tax, paid parking and the Clean Energy Fund, and restructure two others.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Grow the tax baseSaid: What they said
Says Portland cannot tax its way out of a shrinking base and must grow it back, and would right-size the business tax structure to stay competitive.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
Tax polluters, vacanciesSaid: What they said
Would tax polluters and vacant units, and redirect consultant spending to core services.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Replace the Arts TaxSaid: What they said
Voted against increasing the Arts Tax and wants to replace it without cutting arts funding, possibly by folding it into the Children’s Levy; hopes to sustain parks without another tax increase.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
Tax long-vacant rentalsSaid: What they said
Told City Club in 2024 the City should tax rental units left vacant for long periods and replace the one-size-fits-all Arts Tax with a variable tax.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Tax the richSaid: What they said
Lists “Tax the Rich to Fund our Communities” as a goal while lowering the tax burden on working families.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
Scrutinize contracts firstSaid: What they said
Would strengthen oversight and scrutinize contracts before raising taxes or fees.
Police staffingAdd police officers, expand non-police responders, or both?19 of 21 on recordNot found: Guy Frankenstein, Larry Kelly
Candidates differ on filling existing police vacancies, adding more police positions and expanding teams that respond without police. Each approach needs staff and funding.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Rebuild where gapsSaid: What they said
Supports rebuilding police staffing where there are documented service gaps, while investing in alternative responders, prevention and community services so police are not the default response.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Unarmed responders, overtime cutsSaid: What they said
Moved over $2 million to hire unarmed crisis responders, cut police overtime and would audit police programs yearly; her platform does not say whether to hire more sworn officers.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
Outreach, not more officersSaid: What they said
Told the 2024 OPB/Oregonian questionnaire she would not vote to fund hundreds more police officers, preferring clinical outreach teams with behavioral-health expertise and community-based safety.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerMore cops
Said: What they said
His filing says “More cops” and calls for locking up people he describes as dangerously unstable and drug-affected.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
Unarmed responders firstSaid: What they said
Says a policing approach does not make Portland safer; would expand Street Response and the bureau’s unarmed support specialists to reduce lethally armed responses. Her platform does not say whether to hire more sworn officers.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
More police, cultural changeSaid: What they said
Told the 2024 OPB/Oregonian questionnaire he supports hiring more police with stipulations: a cultural change, including no longer disqualifying applicants for past marijuana use.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Data over officer countsSaid: What they said
Would address public safety with data-driven, holistic solutions rather than debating the number of sworn officers; his answer does not say whether to hire more.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
Increase police, reserveSaid: What they said
Told the 2024 OPB/Oregonian questionnaire his first priority would be to increase and refresh the Portland Police and the Police Reserve, the reserve serving as a stepping stone to full-time officers.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
More officers, dispatchersSaid: What they said
Would hire more police officers and 911 dispatchers to improve response times.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Staff for investigationsSaid: What they said
Supports public safety staffing and resources that let police follow through on investigations and fix emergency response times; the page does not say whether that means hiring more sworn officers.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
Police at peer-city levelsSaid: What they said
Told City Club in 2024 he would increase the police force to at least on par with other cities of Portland’s size, with first responders handling non-violent, low-risk calls.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
More officers, more specialistsSaid: What they said
Says Portland needs additional armed officers and additional specialists to respond to non-criminal calls, with the police budget published jargon-free with a cost-benefit analysis.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
More officers, camerasSaid: What they said
Would increase police officers, install cameras at every intersection and buy non-lethal equipment.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Two officers per 1,000Said: What they said
Backs the Safer Portland goal of two sworn officers per 1,000 residents, funded without raising taxes.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
Fund PSR, add policeSaid: What they said
Told OPB in 2024 he would fully fund Street Response and CHAT and use police sparingly, but that more police and budget are needed for officers who are well-trained and not over-stressed.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Add detectives firstSaid: What they said
Says that as Portland adds police officers it should prioritize detectives who follow through on reports.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
Add police officersSaid: What they said
Would increase funding to add police officers and fully staff every fire station.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Upstream before hiringSaid: What they said
Prioritizes upstream community-safety interventions and says cities like Baltimore show crime can fall without inflated police hiring; Street Response and navigation programs let officers focus on violent crime.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
Needs, not a numberSaid: What they said
If Portland needs more police, says it should start with police accountability and be intentional about where positions go, and would consider strengthening detectives and specialized units; staffing should follow need, not a set number.
Clearing campsKeep funding camp removals at current levels?13 of 21 on record
A 2025 amendment to move about $4.3 million from removals to services failed; camping rules stayed in place.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Move it to housingSaid: What they said
Would reduce camp-removal funding and redirect it to housing services, bringing the proposal back to voters; he also supports clearing unsafe camps while providing stable housing and support for the people there.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Angelita Morillo: YesShift away from sweepsRecorded vote · Budget amendment
Voted yes on Shift funding away from homeless-camp removals
Said: What they said
Says she prepared legislation strengthening oversight of the homelessness contractor Urban Alchemy while supporting a shift away from costly homeless camp sweeps toward public bathrooms, sanitation and low-barrier jobs.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
Shift some to ParksSaid: What they said
Not in its current form: would keep removals for camps posing serious health, safety or access problems, but shift some Impact Reduction Program capacity into an embedded team in Parks and other front-line bureaus.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerNot found
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
Redirect from sweepsSaid: What they said
Would redirect effort away from city sweeps and hostile architecture toward long-term housing with treatment.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
Consistent camping enforcementSaid: What they said
Would consistently enforce clear boundaries citywide: when appropriate shelter is available, camping should not be allowed indefinitely in rights-of-way, parks or on private property; the page does not say whether removal funding should stay at current levels.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Health-and-safety focusSaid: What they said
Would focus encampment relocation on genuine health and safety risks, with notice, outreach, property storage and a meaningful offer of shelter or housing; she does not say whether removal funding should stay at its level.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
Cost-benefit study firstSaid: What they said
Would commission a thorough cost-benefit analysis of sweeps and encampment removals before dismantling, rebuilding or changing anything, and revisit the camping and sleeping ban in depth.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
Camps stay until sheltersSaid: What they said
Says that until new shelters are built, people reported camping would return to their camp or a shelter as they prefer, then be moved into shelters; his page does not address current removal funding.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
No sidewalk campingSaid: What they said
Says the city cannot allow camping on sidewalks anymore and must create managed campgrounds as soon as possible as the immediate alternative; his page does not say whether removal funding should stay at current levels.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Steve Novick: NoFund hazardous-camp removalRecorded vote · Budget amendment
Voted no on Shift funding away from homeless-camp removals
Said: What they said
Says he led the fight against a proposal to slash funding for removing the most hazardous camps; does not support indiscriminate sweeps.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
Enforce camping banSaid: What they said
Told OPB in 2024 he favors arresting and jailing campers who refuse repeated shelter offers, with compassionate camping ban enforcement and wrap-around services; the answer does not address current removal funding.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Tiffany Koyama Lane: YesEnd sweeps, fund housingRecorded vote · Budget amendment
Voted yes on Shift funding away from homeless-camp removals
Said: What they said
Voted to move removal money toward rental assistance; calls current sweeps cruel and ineffective, destroying paperwork and medication and shuffling people between camps with no path to housing, and would send camp safety issues to the right response team.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
Account first, then decideSaid: What they said
Answered no, but would pause any increase or cut until a clear accounting shows what the program spends and achieves; agrees rights-of-way must stay clear and wants a more compassionate, coordinated approach with the County and providers.
Data centersRestrict new AI data centers in the city?7 of 21 on record
Data centers draw large amounts of power and water; several candidates propose a moratorium or ban, others are silent.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Temporary pauseSaid: What they said
Supports a temporary pause on new AI data centers while the city evaluates their effects on electricity, water, infrastructure, noise and neighborhoods, with large users paying their share.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Stop new data centersSaid: What they said
Lists “Stop new data centers” as a second-term priority; her pamphlet says she is working to shut down data center expansion.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
Conditions on big centersSaid: What they said
Would put stronger conditions on large new data centers: transparency on resource use, recovery of infrastructure costs from the companies, and strong energy-efficiency, water-use and labor standards, so residents do not subsidize them.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerNot found
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
Moratorium on AI centersSaid: What they said
Would implement a moratorium on AI data centers to stop the takeover of natural resources.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
Restrict new data centersSaid: What they said
Supports restricting new AI data centers.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Data-center moratoriumSaid: What they said
Would champion a moratorium on data centers to protect the water supply and farmland and keep costs off households.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
Restrict until standardsSaid: What they said
Supports restricting new AI data centers while the City sets standards for resource use, environmental impacts, infrastructure costs, community impacts and transparency; a facility meeting them with a public benefit could be considered.
Street ResponseExpand Portland Street Response to a full 24/7 role?14 of 21 on record
The unarmed crisis team's scope and funding have been contested at Council.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Toward 24/7, if dataSaid: What they said
Supports expanding Street Response toward 24/7 where data shows it can safely handle calls that do not need police, tied to measurable outcomes, response times and demand.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Angelita Morillo: YesExpand to 24/7Recorded vote
Voted yes on Expand Portland Street Response’s role
Said: What they said
Would expand Portland Street Response to 24 hours a day, every day of the year.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
24/7 in crisis systemSaid: What they said
Would expand Street Response to 24 hours inside the existing behavioral-health system, with clearer roles alongside Project Respond’s 24-hour crisis teams and Tri-County 911’s frequent-caller work, and sustained follow-up for repeated crises.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerNot found
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
24/7 citywide coverageSaid: What they said
Commits to budget amendments and votes for full 24/7 citywide Street Response funding in every budget cycle.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
Police staffing firstSaid: What they said
Supports Street Response, but before a 24/7 expansion would first add police officers for 911 calls and for situations where Street Response needs police support; open to expanding it once police staffing is adequate.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Sustain and improveSaid: What they said
Supports sustaining and improving Portland Street Response, with clear performance standards and stronger coordination with behavioral-health providers and other first responders; she does not say whether it should run around the clock.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
Street Response 24/7Said: What they said
Told City Club in 2024 he would increase Portland Street Response and similar services and move them to 24/7 staffing so police can respond to calls requiring a sworn officer.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
Keep funding itSaid: What they said
Would continue funding Portland Street Response in some capacity (her answer calls it “Portland Street Rescue”), along with tiny home villages and overnight shelters; she does not address a 24/7 expansion.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Support street responseSaid: What they said
Says Portland needs to expand mental health and addiction services and support the street response team; his statement does not say whether Street Response should expand to a 24/7 role.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
Fully fund PSRSaid: What they said
Told OPB in 2024 he would vote to fully fund Portland Street Response and CHAT; his answer does not say whether Street Response should expand to a 24/7 role.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Steve Novick: YesUnarmed welfare checksRecorded vote
Voted yes on Expand Portland Street Response’s role
Said: What they said
Is working to move 911 welfare-check calls to unarmed responders and to get Medicaid to reimburse Street Response; the page does not say whether Street Response should expand to a 24/7 role.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
PSR 24-hour serviceSaid: What they said
Told City Club in 2024 the city must add shelter beds and make Portland Street Response a 24-hour service by adding personnel.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Tiffany Koyama Lane: YesTrained responders firstRecorded vote
Voted yes on Expand Portland Street Response’s role
Said: What they said
Calls Street Response an important part of public safety that meets people in crisis with trained professionals rather than an armed response, letting police focus on violent crime; a 24/7 role is unsaid.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
24/7 later, overhaul firstSaid: What they said
Supports a 24/7 Street Response eventually, but first an operational overhaul of dispatch, coverage, recruitment and retention and a way to share the cost with the County; would consider temporarily reducing hours to relieve current staff.
Street repair feeKeep the monthly street repair fee?8 of 21 on record
Council created a monthly transportation utility fee in 2026; some candidates would repeal or replace it.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Only if provenSaid: What they said
Would oppose keeping or adding fees without first showing they are necessary and that existing transportation dollars are used well; wants to be clear about what each fee delivers.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Angelita Morillo: YesAffordability protections firstRecorded vote
Voted yes on Create a monthly transportation utility fee
Said: What they said
Says she improved the proposed transportation utility fee by requiring the City to study fairer options and add affordability protections before it takes effect; the page does not say whether to keep the fee.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
General Fund firstSaid: What they said
Skeptical that street maintenance needs another monthly fee; notes under 2% of PBOT funding comes from the General Fund and would look there for more maintenance money before adding $12 a month to household bills.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerNot found
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
Keep only if provenSaid: What they said
Would keep the street repair fee only if PBOT clearly shows it is necessary and produces measurable results; otherwise would support repealing it.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Steve Novick: YesFees stop further decayRecorded vote
Voted yes on Create a monthly transportation utility fee
Said: What they said
Says Council should tell voters that at best the fees keep major streets from getting worse, and that the alternative is to let the city die.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
Costs shared by beneficiariesSaid: What they said
Wants Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.28, sharing facility costs among those who benefit, applied more broadly to transportation; his statement does not say whether to keep the monthly street repair fee.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Tiffany Koyama Lane: YesFee with low-income reliefRecorded vote
Voted yes on Create a monthly transportation utility fee
Said: What they said
Says she secured low-income relief under the new Transportation Utility Fee and directed 25 percent of it to Vision Zero and sidewalks.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
Eliminate the feeSaid: What they said
Would eliminate the monthly street repair fee, citing the equity of its largely flat charge for renters, transit users and lower-income households; would audit transportation obligations and seek outside and fairer revenue, naming no single replacement.
Water ratesRaise water bills to pay for the Bull Run filtration plant and system repairs?7 of 21 on record
Rates rose about $5 a month in 2026 for the whole water system, repairs included. Separately, on May 20, 2026 Council voted 9–3 to borrow up to $525 million for the filtration plant, repaid from water bills.
- Ali BeaudoinTax and business consultant
Phased, with protectionsSaid: What they said
Would support necessary, phased water-rate increases for filtration and aging pipes, but only with aggressive cost controls, outside funding and protections for households that cannot afford higher bills.
- Angelita MorilloIncumbent councilor
Angelita Morillo: NoFought rate increasesRecorded vote
Voted no on Raise annual water rates
Said: What they said
Lists “Fought water rate increases” among her first-term promises kept.
- Cristal OteroSocial-work and government-administration professional
Judge by monthly billSaid: What they said
Notes rates rose 8.1 percent and the Water Bureau pays about $100 million a year in debt service; would judge borrowing by monthly household cost. The statement does not say whether to raise rates for filtration.
- Darren McCormickWriter and discussion organizerNot found
Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Esther LeónPhysical therapist and community-college professor
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Guy FrankensteinHuman-rights graduate student
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Heart Free PhamCampus safety officer; former teacher
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Joel CorcoranLawyer; former Council policy counsel
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- John SweeneyMechanical designer; former parks worker
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Keir LegreeArt-glass business manager and founder
Lower water billsSaid: What they said
Says water and sewer bills are over four times Las Vegas’s and rising, and would work to reduce infrastructure project costs to lower bills; the statement does not say whether bills should rise to pay for the filtration plant.
- Kellie TorresPortland Parks external-affairs manager
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver IIIInstrument technician; National Guard veteran
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Kimberly TuckerBehavior analyst and mental-health volunteer
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Larry KellyChef with a biochemistry degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Martin WardHolds a political-science master’s degree
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Matthias HallettEstate-planning attorney
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Patrick HiltonBuilding operations manager
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Steve NovickIncumbent councilor; former city commissioner
Steve Novick: YesOffset with PCEFRecorded vote
Voted yes on Raise annual water rates
Said: What they said
Suggests Clean Energy Fund money could pay part of the water filtration plant and help offset water-rate increases.
- Terry ParkerRetired customer-relations professional
Not foundNothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed; a research gap, not a position.
- Tiffany Koyama LaneIncumbent councilor; former teacher, union organizer
Tiffany Koyama Lane: NoReduced utility hikesRecorded vote
Voted no on Raise annual water rates
Said: What they said
Says she reduced utility hikes for working-class Portlanders.
- Tom SollittBranding, marketing and events professional
Alternatives before increasesSaid: What they said
Would not support more water-rate increases until alternatives are exhausted, through outside funding, scrutiny of remaining costs and independent oversight; says the plant is legally required and he cannot promise increases are avoidable.
What the fundraising records show
January 1, 2025–2026-11-04 · Current transaction snapshot. November–December 2024 is missing; recent filings and manual-export coverage are provisional. Reviewed candidate–committee links do not make every transaction a 2026 campaign transaction. Official account balances and editorial findings are updated separately.
City source checked November 4, 2026
The City’s latest matching-fund totals
The City reports $1,056,052.00 distributed to these 6 campaigns. Our transaction records contain $885,433.00 in matching receipts.
These are two views of the same public funding. They are shown side by side and are not added together. The City’s page has no common transaction cutoff; campaign-filed records here run through 2026-11-04.
District 3
- Tiffany Koyama Lane$300,000.00
Recorded receipts: $277,508.00 · Difference: +$22,492.00
- Angelita Morillo$279,515.00
Recorded receipts: $236,287.00 · Difference: +$43,228.00
- Steve Novick$200,000.00
Recorded receipts: $108,201.00 · Difference: +$91,799.00
- Kellie Torres$200,000.00
Recorded receipts: $200,000.00
- Esther León$38,567.00
Recorded receipts: $29,507.00 · Difference: +$9,060.00
- Tom Sollitt$37,970.00
Recorded receipts: $33,930.00 · Difference: +$4,040.00
A difference may reflect reporting dates or missing coverage; it is not a finding of unreported or improper money. These cumulative City figures do not supply payment dates for the transaction charts below. Gross distributions may later be reduced by returned funds.
Check the City’s figuresDownload City figures (CSV)Source and definitions (JSON)
Reviewed records are available for 9 of 21 candidates. These linked committees reported $1,274,033.19 in gross cash contributions during the observation window; this is not a complete race total.
Reviewed City matching receipts account for $885,433.00 (69.5%) of that cash. The remaining $388,600.19 includes individual, organizational, self/family, aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed receipts; it is not exclusively individual donations.
Tiffany Koyama Lane reported the highest gross cash total among reviewed candidates ($368,366.85). Steve Novick reported the highest cash total excluding reviewed City matches ($97,949.39).
$195,537.63 (50.3%) of cash outside reviewed matches is aggregate small contributions or other undisclosed sources. The underlying contributors cannot be counted or linked to other candidates from those records.
The largest combined monthly cash total in the observed part of 2026 was $399,869.87 in 2026-08, including $327,223.00 in reviewed City matches. The newest month is incomplete and recent receipts remain provisional; this timing does not identify a cause.
Outside reviewed City matches, $153,720.86 is reported with a Portland, Oregon location, $22,135.92 elsewhere in Oregon and $16,155.78 outside Oregon. Another $196,587.63 has unknown or aggregate location. Reported postal locality is not verified city or district residency.
| Candidate | Gross cash contributions | Included City matches | Cash excluding matches | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ali Beaudoin | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Joel Corcoran | $4,195.00 | $0.00 | $4,195.00 | Reviewed committee records |
| Guy Frankenstein | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Matthias Hallett | $3,323.19 | $0.00 | $3,323.19 | Reviewed committee records |
| Patrick Hilton | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Larry Kelly | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Tiffany Koyama Lane | $368,366.85 | $277,508.00 | $90,858.85 | Reviewed committee records |
| Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver III | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Keir Legree | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Esther León | $35,834.00 | $29,507.00 | $6,327.00 | Reviewed committee records |
| Darren McCormick | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Angelita Morillo | $314,559.76 | $236,287.00 | $78,272.76 | Reviewed committee records |
| Steve Novick | $206,150.39 | $108,201.00 | $97,949.39 | Reviewed committee records |
| Cristal Otero | $1,190.00 | $0.00 | $1,190.00 | Reviewed committee records |
| Terry Parker | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Heart Free Pham | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Tom Sollitt | $43,487.00 | $33,930.00 | $9,557.00 | Reviewed committee records |
| John Sweeney | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Kellie Torres | $296,927.00 | $200,000.00 | $96,927.00 | Reviewed committee records |
| Kimberly Tucker | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
| Martin Ward | Not available | Not available | Not available | No reviewed link; not zero |
Fundraising totals describe financial activity, not voter support or a forecast of the result. A difference in recorded receipts does not establish the effect of an endorsement, controversy or campaign strategy. Candidate profiles separate source types, geography, timing, loans, noncash support and refunds.
Four votes that split this Council
Only Morillo, Novick and Koyama Lane sit on Council today. The other 18 have no votes yet; that is not a judgment.
Spend less on clearing camps to fund other services?
Angelita Morillo: YesSteve Novick: NoTiffany Koyama Lane: Yes
Spend less on clearing camps to fund other services?
This proposal would move about $4.3 million from clearing homeless camps to a package supporting housing, food, immigration services and city staff. Camping rules would stay in place.
Our reading of the record
- Angelita MorilloProposed moving camp-removal money to other services
- Steve NovickOpposed moving the camp-removal money in this proposal
- Tiffany Koyama LaneSupported moving camp-removal money to other services
This was a spending amendment, not a vote to repeal the criminal camping ban. Green’s related Ground Score amendment did not take effect because the parent proposal failed.
No other candidate addresses this exact choice in the sources we reviewed (18 checked).
Read the votes and their reasonsRaise water bills by about $5 a month?
Angelita Morillo: NoSteve Novick: YesTiffany Koyama Lane: No
Raise water bills by about $5 a month?
This increase would bring in more money for the water system. A typical monthly water charge would rise from about $66 to $71, before sewer and stormwater charges.
Our reading of the record
- Angelita MorilloOpposed the water borrowing and higher water charges
- Steve NovickSupported water-project borrowing and the annual utility charges
- Tiffany Koyama LaneSupported construction borrowing; opposed higher utility charges
The typical-bill estimate assumes five hundred cubic feet of monthly water use. Actual bills depend on use, billing period and applicable assistance; this is not the total combined utility bill.
No other candidate addresses this exact choice in the sources we reviewed (18 checked).
Read the votes and their reasonsUse expected savings to help fund police and firefighters?
Angelita Morillo: NoSteve Novick: YesTiffany Koyama Lane: No
Use expected savings to help fund police and firefighters?
The city expected the office that checks police conduct to have money left over. This proposal would use those expected savings for police and fire services. The savings were not guaranteed.
Our reading of the record
- Angelita MorilloFavored restoring more services while keeping police-oversight money
- Steve NovickSupported several ways to pay for a smaller set of services
- Tiffany Koyama LaneFavored restoring more services; rejected July’s smaller plan
The tradeoff concerned using money allocated to the new oversight office. The proposal did not abolish that office, and expected underspending was a forecast.
No other candidate addresses this exact choice in the sources we reviewed (18 checked).
Read the votes and their reasonsBack these starting terms for renovating Moda Center?
Angelita Morillo: NoSteve Novick: YesTiffany Koyama Lane: No
Back these starting terms for renovating Moda Center?
The city proposed $120 million for renovations and $275 million for future building needs over 20 years. This vote approved terms for negotiations, not a final contract.
Our reading of the record
- Angelita MorilloSought more financial safeguards before an arena commitment
- Steve NovickRaised the proposed arena rent, then supported the terms
- Tiffany Koyama LaneRejected the arena terms after seeking stronger financial conditions
A negotiating framework, not a final construction contract. Support or opposition to this package is not a complete position on retaining the Trail Blazers.
What other candidates have said
- John SweeneySaid: Opposes spending aimed at keeping the Blazers in PortlandPamphlet p. 53
- Martin WardSaid: Rejects Moda renovationsPamphlet p. 55
Not addressed in their sources (16)
About this race
How to vote
You rank up to six candidates for three seats. Ranking more people never hurts your first choice. How it works
Election Day: November 3, 2026 · official drop boxes close at 8 p.m.
Find an official ballot drop box
The League of Women Voters' VOTE411.org shows every race on your ballot from your address, in your choice of language, with candidates' answers to the League's questions where they gave them.
What this Council can do
Council adopts city laws and the budget. The mayor and city administrator run operations. Council cannot independently set TriMet fares, school curricula or state law.
How this list was made
Same questions for everyone, A–Z. Each short label summarizes a sourced position; we do not endorse, rank or score. The four featured votes illustrate disagreements over spending and city services; the Votes page covers 29 topics. This is a selected record, not every Council vote.
The comparison covers the 21 names printed on this district’s ballot. The City also lists Michael A. Johnson as a certified write-in candidate; we have not completed a profile. See the official candidate register.
Candidate sources and plain-language comparisons checked November 2, 2026. Original Council record reviewed September 18, 2026; recent developments are dated separately. AI-assisted; a separate human editorial review is still pending.
See the latest Zenith, arena, budget and police-oversight votes →
Terms explained
- Amendment
- A proposed change to a measure before the final vote. Voting for an amendment is not the same as voting for the whole measure.
- Supplemental budget
- A mid-year change to the city budget after the main budget is adopted.
- Appropriation
- Permission to spend money on something. It does not mean the money has been spent or the result achieved.
- PCEF
- The Portland Clean Energy Fund: a tax on large retailers that pays for climate projects. Council has debated using its interest for other services.
- Term sheet
- Starting terms for a negotiation. Approving one is not a final contract.
- Housing owned by the public or a nonprofit and rented at controlled prices.
- CEI Hub
- The fuel-storage area along the Willamette in Northwest Portland, where Zenith Energy operates.
- Ranked choice
- You rank candidates in order. If your first choice is eliminated or already elected, your vote counts toward your next choice.
