Skip to content
Kimberly Tucker

District 3 candidate · Portland City Council · November 3, 2026

Kimberly Tucker

Behavior analyst and mental-health volunteer.

Reach the campaign

In their words

Said: My name is Kimberly Tucker, and, as I tend to have to tell people, I do actually go by Kimberly.

Campaign site

Candidate statement · Current campaign website; extracted September 20, 2026

Tucker · About the Candidate ↗

Verbatim opening of the campaign site's About page after the greeting “Hello all!”. No pamphlet statement; no statement in a City filing among the published sources.

No pamphlet statement was published; this is the verbatim opening of their campaign site’s About page.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Emphasizes program accountability, constituents’ needs and stronger cost-benefit analysis of city spending.

  • Examine why programs receive or lose funding.
  • Evaluate whether spending decisions are adequately supported.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Program evaluation
  • Spending accountability

Her response explains how she would judge programs, but not which policy outcomes she would prioritize when evidence and resources point in competing directions. That distinction remains important for comparing her with detailed platforms.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

Camps, crime and who responds

More officers, specialists
What
Said: Says police response times are too long; would add armed officers and specialists for non-criminal calls, focus crisis-intervention training on mental health and de-escalation, and publish the police budget in plain language with a cost-benefit analysis.
How
Not in their sources
Measured by
Not in their sources

Your bills and taxes

Cost-benefit analysis
What
Said: Wants stronger cost-benefit analysis and clearer explanations for program funding decisions. Specific programs to expand or cut are not named in the reviewed response.
How
Not in their sources
Measured by
Not in their sources

Streets, buses and air

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 8 questions. Kimberly Tucker is on record on 1, with 7 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

No answer we could find
  • Public money and terms for renovating the Moda Center?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Raise new revenue, or hold the line on taxes and fees?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep funding camp removals at current levels?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Restrict new AI data centers in the city?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Expand Portland Street Response to a full 24/7 role?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep the monthly street repair fee?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Raise water bills to pay for the Bull Run filtration plant and system repairs?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

On record
  • Hire more sworn officers, or invest first elsewhere?

    Said: Says Portland needs additional armed officers and additional specialists to respond to non-criminal calls, with the police budget published jargon-free with a cost-benefit analysis.

Compare every candidate

Council votes

No Council vote yet. That is not a judgment about experience.

A question the evidence leaves open

Which programs would you evaluate first, and what evidence would change your funding decision?

Sources (2)

  1. Mercury questionnaire · Tucker’s responsesCandidate statement · September 9, 2026Candidate responses within reporting; the publisher’s campaign assessment is not adopted.
  2. Tucker · The other issuesCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 22, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.