Skip to content
Matthias Hallett

District 3 candidate · Portland City Council · November 3, 2026

Matthias Hallett

Estate-planning attorney; former deputy probate clerk.

Campaign finance: sources, amounts and timing ↓

In their words

Said: Police should be present, visible, and known in the neighborhoods they serve, officers walking a beat, not just responding to 911 calls after the fact.

Pamphlet p. 58

Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; extracted September 20, 2026

Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 58 ↗

Verbatim opening of the candidate's own statement; publication by the county does not verify the claims.

The verbatim opening of their voters’ pamphlet statement, the same rule for every candidate. We chose nothing.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Argues that police staffing, faster permitting and a more competitive business tax structure are prerequisites for Portland’s recovery.

  • Fund police recruitment, retention and neighborhood presence.
  • Set permitting deadlines with escalation for stalled applications.
  • Recruit manufacturing and other employers that sell outside the region.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Police capacity
  • Private-sector recovery

He links economic recovery to stronger policing and a lighter burden on business. Expanding staffing without new taxes depends on reallocations or growth; the reviewed materials do not reconcile those costs.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Faster permits to build housing
What

Supports faster building permits, deadlines and a way to escalate stalled applications.

Full position and context

Favors faster permitting, deadlines and escalation when applications stall.

How
Said: Would set strict permitting timelines with automatic escalation when a project stalls.
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Camps, crime and who responds

Two police per 1,000 residents
What

Wants two police officers for every 1,000 residents without raising taxes, with more recruitment and officers on the street.

Full position and context

Supports a goal of two police officers per 1,000 residents without raising taxes; emphasizes recruitment and street presence.

How
Said: Backs the Safer Portland charter amendment: a minimum police staffing level funded by dedicating part of existing Clean Energy Fund revenue to recruitment and training, with no new taxes; would fund competitive pay.
Measured by
Said: Two sworn officers per 1,000 residents, against about 1.26 today.

Your bills and taxes

Audit spending; ease business burdens
What

Supports audits, limits on unaccountable spending, lighter burdens on businesses and a deal to keep the Blazers.

Full position and context

Calls for audits and limits on unaccountable spending, lighter burdens on businesses, and an agreement to retain the Blazers.

How
Said: Would order forensic audits of homelessness spending, with criminal investigations where evidence of waste or fraud exists, and right-size the business tax structure.
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Streets, buses and air

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 9 questions. Matthias Hallett is on record on 3, with 6 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

No answer we could find
  • Rezone the inner east side to allow apartment buildings off the main streets (the Inner Eastside Zoning Project)?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep funding camp removals at current levels?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Restrict new AI data centers in the city?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Expand Portland Street Response to a full 24/7 role?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep the monthly street repair fee?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Raise water bills to pay for the Bull Run filtration plant and system repairs?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

On record
  • Public money and terms for renovating the Moda Center?

    Said: Wants a deal that keeps the Blazers long-term while protecting taxpayers; calls for good-faith, transparent negotiation.

  • When, if ever, would they raise taxes or fees?

    Said: Says Portland cannot tax its way out of a shrinking base and must grow it back, and would right-size the business tax structure to stay competitive.

  • Add police officers, expand non-police responders, or both?

    Said: Backs the Safer Portland goal of two sworn officers per 1,000 residents, funded without raising taxes.

Compare every candidate

Council votes

No Council vote yet. That is not a judgment about experience.

A question the evidence leaves open

Which taxes would change, and how would police expansion be funded during the transition?

Sources (2)

  1. Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 58Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 18, 2026Written by the candidate or campaign. Publication by the county does not verify the claims.
  2. Hallett · Re-Vision platformCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 18, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.

Campaign finance

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04 · Current transaction snapshot. November–December 2024 is missing; recent filings and manual-export coverage are provisional. Reviewed candidate–committee links do not make every transaction a 2026 campaign transaction. Official account balances and editorial findings are updated separately.

Friends of Matthias Hallett for District 3

ORESTAR committee 24966 · Latest reported cash-contribution date: 2026-10-30.

Gross cash contributions
$3,323.19
Included City matching funds
$0.00
Cash excluding reviewed matches
$3,323.19
Cash-contribution records
35

Donation amounts and funding sources

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04, before refunds. Median, mean and mode cover named individual donations only. They exclude aggregate small contributions, other undisclosed sources, City matching deposits, businesses, committees, labor and candidate/family entries. We cannot calculate the median of all donations from combined records because the underlying gift amounts are unavailable. An even-sized median can have a half cent; displayed amounts round to cents.

Small contributions reported in aggregate is ORESTAR’s “Miscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under” category. The disclosure threshold applies to a contributor’s total to a committee in a calendar year; a combined row can contain many gifts and exceed $100. Other undisclosed sources are shown separately. Oregon reporting rules, pages 72–73.

Named individual size bands add all recorded gifts to each reported donor group over this window: a group giving five $25 gifts belongs in the $100.01–$1,000 band. These are conservative filing groups, not verified unique people. Aggregate rows do not reveal donor counts or individual gift sizes. Committees include known committee IDs and reported unregistered or party committees. Reported businesses are not automatically large corporations; PAC and union affiliations need separate review.

Named individual gift records
17
Median — named individual donations only
$104.48
Mean — named individual donations only
$115.39
Mode — named individual donations only
$104.48
Middle half of individual gifts
$103.30–$104.48
Smallest / largest individual gift
$52.40 / $250.00

Each mode occurs 8 times. 11 named individual groups; 0 gave $100 or less in total during this window.

This bar excludes City matching. It shows $3,323.19 in recorded cash, before refunds. City matching receipts of $0.00 are separate.

Cash excluding City matching: $3,323.19. Separate City matches: $0.00.
SourceCashShare of non-City cashRecords
Named individuals giving $100 or less in total$0.000.0%0
Named individuals giving $100.01–$1,000 in total$1,961.5959.0%17
Named individuals giving more than $1,000 in total$0.000.0%0
Reported businesses$0.000.0%0
Political committees / PACs$0.000.0%0
Reported labor organizations$0.000.0%0
Candidate / immediate family$0.000.0%0
Other named source types$0.000.0%0
Small contributions reported in aggregate$1,361.6041.0%18
Other undisclosed sources$0.000.0%0
All named source types: gift statistics

Businesses, committees, labor, self/family and other named sources are included here. City matching, aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources are excluded. This is a distribution of records, not individual people.

17 records · Median across all named source types $104.48 · Mean $115.39 · Mode $104.48 · Largest $250.00

Largest reported business, committee and labor sources

No named business, committee or labor cash contributions in these records.

Names and types follow the filings; related subsidiaries and sponsors are not consolidated.

Download these statistics (JSON) · Inspect contribution records

Every reported contribution, at a glance

Each square is one line in the filings, excluding City matching payments. Bigger squares mean more money; the scale is the same for every candidate. Gray squares show small contributions reported in aggregate; one square can contain many gifts. Hatched squares, when present, show other undisclosed sources.

17records with a reported source · $1,961.59
18Small contributions reported in aggregate · $1,361.60
$0.00City matching deposits · 0 records, shown separately
PersonOrganization or PACCandidate or familySmall contributions reported in aggregate
Selected record · 2026-07-28$250.00

Ben Davis · Individual · ORESTAR 5755689

See this reported source

Largest reported funding sources

Totals across each source’s records, before refunds. Aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources are excluded.

Top five: 68.1% of named-source cash
  1. 4 records · Individual
  2. 3 records · Individual
  3. Ben Davis$250.00
    1 record · Individual
  4. 1 record · Individual
  5. 1 record · Individual
  6. 2 records · Individual
See the next 4 reported sources
  1. Alex Potash$104.481 record
  2. Maureen Hurst$104.481 record
  3. Tracy Harris$104.481 record
  4. Brendan Pettit$103.301 record
Inspect every 35 record in this view
DateReported sourceAmountORESTAR ID
2026-07-15Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $493.485774650
2026-07-28Ben Davis$250.005755689
2026-10-14Julie Mumford $208.655900408
2026-08-07Daniel Houf$200.005755780
2026-09-09Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $175.005802075
2026-08-19Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $104.805774677
2026-07-31Mark Dinsmore$104.485755693
2026-08-10Tracy Harris$104.485760823
2026-08-12Alex Potash$104.485771204
2026-08-31Mark Dinsmore$104.485802080
2026-08-31Maureen Hurst$104.485802084
2026-09-20Mark Dinsmore$104.485819807
2026-10-14Rebecca Green$104.485900300
2026-10-30Mark Dinsmore$104.485928164
2026-07-15Naomi LeClair$103.305755750
2026-07-15Brendan Pettit$103.305755773
2026-07-15Rebecca Green$103.305755779
2026-09-19Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $76.355819815
2026-08-12Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $52.705774673
2026-08-12Rebecca Green$52.405771202
2026-08-17Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $52.405774675
2026-08-29Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $52.405802095
2026-09-04Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $52.405802098
2026-09-17Alicia Emel$52.405819798
2026-10-17Alicia Emel$52.405900569

A combined row may represent many gifts; it is not one donor. Reported names are not verified identities. The squares show gross receipts, not money left after refunds.

3 of 11 matched individual donor entries appear on more than one reported date. These are not confirmed counts of people.

Where the cash came from

Exclusive source categories; these rows sum to gross cash contributions.
Reported source typeCashShare of cashRecords
City matching funds (reviewed payor)$0.000.0%0
Small contributions reported in aggregate$1,361.6041.0%18
Itemized individuals$1,961.5959.0%17
Political committees$0.000.0%0
Business entities$0.000.0%0
Labor organizations$0.000.0%0
Candidate and immediate family$0.000.0%0
Other identified source types$0.000.0%0

Matching receipts are classified first, then aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources, then the reported source type. “Other” does not mean an individual. Generic reporting labels are not treated as donors. Types follow the filing: a union-affiliated PAC may appear under political committees, not labor organizations. This is not a reviewed economic-sector classification.

Reported geography of cash outside City matches

  • Reported Portland, Oregon$825.71 (24.8%)
  • Other reported Oregon locations$781.40 (23.5%)
  • Outside Oregon (reported state)$354.48 (10.7%)
  • Location unknown / aggregate$1,361.60 (41.0%)

Reported counterparty city/state on nonmatching cash receipts; aggregate categories and unrecognized states stay unknown. Portland postal locality is not a city-boundary or district-residency test. The denominator here is $3,323.19, not all cash contributions.

When receipts were reported

The largest 2026 Monday–Sunday week outside reviewed City matches was 2026-07-13–2026-07-19: $803.38. This describes timing, not why contributors gave.

Monthly cash, loan and noncash records

Gold bars are reviewed City matches; green bars are other cash. Each profile uses its own scale. The table supplies exact values and separate financing measures.

MonthGross cashCity matchesOther cash contributionsLoans receivedIn-kind support
2025-01$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-02$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-03$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-04$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-05$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-06$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-07$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-08$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-09$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-10$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-11$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-12$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-01$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-02$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-03$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-04$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-05$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-06$0.00$0.00$0.00$45.00$0.00
2026-07$1,322.64$0.00$1,322.64$0.00$0.00
2026-08$1,008.97$0.00$1,008.97$0.00$0.00
2026-09$480.63$0.00$480.63$0.00$0.00
2026-10$510.95$0.00$510.95$0.00$0.00
2026-11$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00

Other financing and cash uses

Cash payments
$3,466.12

These are separate measures, not amounts to add to fundraising. Loans are financing, in-kind support is noncash, and refunds are not new receipts. Payables are not added to their subsequent payments.

All recorded accounting measures
Accounting basisReported amountRecords
cash contribution$3,323.1935
cash payment$3,466.1261
loan received$45.001
obligation$4,364.001

No combined total is shown: cash movements, obligations, cancellations and adjustments answer different accounting questions.

Current official cash-on-hand and debt balances have not been reconciled to this transaction snapshot. Payments do not tell us how much cash is left without a verified opening balance.