Skip to content
Bill Monahan

Mayor candidate · City of Tigard · November 3, 2026

Bill Monahan

Former Tigard and Milwaukie city manager; attorney and consultant.

Campaign finance: sources, amounts and timing ↓

In their words

Said: I have lived in Tigard since 1982, serving as Planning Director until 1988 and City Manager from 1994 to 2005.

Pamphlet p. 35

Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; extracted September 21, 2026

Washington County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 35 ↗

Verbatim opening of the candidate's own statement; publication by the county does not verify the claims. Skips the heading “About Bill Monahan”.

The verbatim opening of their voters’ pamphlet statement, the same rule for every candidate. We chose nothing.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Calls for less expensive police-facility solutions, transparent financial analysis and core-service affordability.

  • Reassess police-facility plans.
  • Tie project decisions to reliable needs and cost estimates.
  • Improve council, staff and community relationships.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Facilities restraint
  • Managerial experience

He argues for cheaper, better-analyzed facilities and core services voters can afford; the alternative police-facility plan and its full cost are not yet specified.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

Camps, crime and who responds

Affordable police facility
What

Would develop what he calls reasonable police-facility solutions after voters rejected the $150 million bond, while maintaining the public-safety levels residents and businesses need.

How
Said: Follow the 2002 library-bond sequence: option land, fund a modest needs analysis and a project model before asking voters, rather than buying land and awarding design contracts first.
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Your bills and taxes

Costed core services
What

Would focus on core services residents need and can afford, and restore transparency and pursue affordable solutions to the city’s facility needs.

How
Said: Account publicly for how consultant and land costs on the failed $150 million measure were paid and which utility-fund projects were delayed, before choosing between the 2024 site and alternatives.
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Streets, buses and air

Not foundNot found in the sources we reviewed. That is a research gap, not a position.

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 6 questions. Bill Monahan is on record on 3, with 3 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

No answer we could find
  • Tier development charges by home size, discounting smaller and middle homes, for River Terrace 2.0 and citywide, with a decision October 13?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Approve activating Axon’s Fusus live-camera network for police and expand red-light photo enforcement?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Expand the no-camping buffer around shelters and service sites from 500 to 1,000 feet and restrict vehicle camping?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

On record
  • After voters rejected the $150 million bond, build a public-works building first with rate-backed bonds and a smaller police bond later, or sell the Wall Street site?

    Said: Wrote in May 2026 that “there is no need for placing both police and public works on the same site” and that the city “already overpaid for a site more suitable for commercial use”; whether to sell it is unsaid.

    On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.

  • Close a general-fund shortfall of more than $6 million by cutting library staff and city events and drawing reserves, or raise new revenue?

    Said: Would restore and retain library services and focus on core services residents need and can afford; which cuts to reverse and any new revenue are unsaid.

    On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.

  • Cover a $1 million-a-year parks shortfall by raising the parks fee, shifting general-fund money, or asking voters for a parks levy?

    Said: Says the parks bond added parkland the city now recognizes cannot be maintained without more funds; a fee, general-fund shift or levy is unsaid.

    On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.

Compare every candidate

A question the evidence leaves open

What facility alternative would you propose, and what is its full construction and operating cost?

Sources (3)

  1. Washington County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 35Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 18, 2026Written by the candidate or campaign. Publication by the county does not verify the claims.
  2. Monahan · why I’m running (home page)Candidate statement · Website reviewed September 21, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.
  3. Monahan · comparing methods to plan for public facilitiesCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 21, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.

Campaign finance

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04 · Current transaction snapshot. November–December 2024 is missing; recent filings and manual-export coverage are provisional. Reviewed candidate–committee links do not make every transaction a 2026 campaign transaction. Official account balances and editorial findings are updated separately.

No reviewed candidate-to-committee financial breakdown is available in this edition. This is missing coverage, not zero fundraising.