Skip to content
Yi-Kang Hu

Mayor candidate · City of Tigard · November 3, 2026

Yi-Kang Hu

Incumbent mayor and attorney; former research scientist.

Campaign finance: sources, amounts and timing ↓

In their words

Said: Yi-Kang Hu is a tireless advocate for Tigard. He puts community voices first, brings people together, and solves problems.

Pamphlet p. 35

Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; extracted September 21, 2026

Washington County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 35 ↗

Verbatim opening of the candidate's own statement; publication by the county does not verify the claims. The first sentence is under 12 words, so two are used.

The verbatim opening of their voters’ pamphlet statement, the same rule for every candidate. We chose nothing.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Supports more housing choices, easier business processes and reliable city services.

  • Control resident costs through budgeting.
  • Revitalize downtown and commercial districts.
  • Improve transportation safety, parks and library services.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Continuity
  • Core services

He offers steadiness and regional relationships; his budget claims rest on the past two years, and the materials do not say which recurring choices would keep services funded without new shortfalls.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Homes for every budget
What

Would expand housing options for every budget and stage of life.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Camps, crime and who responds

Reliable public safety
What

Would keep public-safety services reliable, responsive and accountable, with emergency readiness and trust between residents and agencies.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Your bills and taxes

Responsible budgeting
What

Would control residents’ costs through responsible budgeting; says he led efforts to close a $6.5 million shortfall while protecting essential services.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Streets, buses and air

Safer streets, sidewalks
What

Would improve transportation safety for pedestrians, cyclists and motorists and fill gaps in sidewalks, trails and infrastructure with regional partners.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 6 questions. Yi-Kang Hu is on record on 3, with 3 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

No answer we could find
  • Tier development charges by home size, discounting smaller and middle homes, for River Terrace 2.0 and citywide, with a decision October 13?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Approve activating Axon’s Fusus live-camera network for police and expand red-light photo enforcement?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Expand the no-camping buffer around shelters and service sites from 500 to 1,000 feet and restrict vehicle camping?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

On record
  • After voters rejected the $150 million bond, build a public-works building first with rate-backed bonds and a smaller police bond later, or sell the Wall Street site?

    Said: Voted February 17, 2026 to refer the $150 million bond; after its defeat told Tigard Life “I’m not going to support anything until we have a robust engagement process,” wanting a citizens committee and a plan for the existing buildings.

  • Close a general-fund shortfall of more than $6 million by cutting library staff and city events and drawing reserves, or raise new revenue?

    Said: Voted yes June 9, 2026 on Resolution 26-22, the budget, saying it focuses on core services and preserves library hours while responding to a general-fund shortfall of more than $6 million.

  • Cover a $1 million-a-year parks shortfall by raising the parks fee, shifting general-fund money, or asking voters for a parks levy?

    Said: Said at the April 21, 2026 council work session, “Down the road, we may look at a levy for extra, but we’re not there yet”; a fee increase or general-fund shift is unsaid.

    On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.

Compare every candidate

A question the evidence leaves open

What recurring budget choices would sustain services without new shortfalls?

Sources (2)

  1. Washington County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 35Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 18, 2026Written by the candidate or campaign. Publication by the county does not verify the claims.
  2. Hu · prioritiesCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 21, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.

Campaign finance

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04 · Current transaction snapshot. November–December 2024 is missing; recent filings and manual-export coverage are provisional. Reviewed candidate–committee links do not make every transaction a 2026 campaign transaction. Official account balances and editorial findings are updated separately.

No reviewed candidate-to-committee financial breakdown is available in this edition. This is missing coverage, not zero fundraising.