BPS
Housing Production Strategy
Which recommendations will be funded, by whom, and on what schedule?
PrimarySource recordThe evidence gaps
Unresolved information needs and dated Council questions, kept alongside the portfolio.
Loading portfolio view…
A public reconstruction of the work. Stages and connections are PCL’s organization of the cited record. This is not authoritative City status, a City partnership, or a complete inventory.
Questions the record can’t yet answer
Each gap identifies a record that could clarify delivery, responsibility or public value. A missing publication does not establish misconduct, inactivity or a missed internal deadline.
Broadway Corridor · Summer 2026 (earlier target)
Arts Tax reform · Sep 30, 2026
Concrete follow-up questions from the October 3 public-source review.
BPS
Which recommendations will be funded, by whom, and on what schedule?
PrimarySource recordPHB
Project-level revised completion dates and actual disbursements are not reconciled here.
PrimarySource recordOffice of the City Administrator
Audit delivery date, final report and corrective-action owners not located.
ReportedSource recordPP&D
A reconciled before/after permit cohort evaluation is not part of this public portfolio.
PrimarySource recordPP&D
Actual FY 2026–27 cost recovery is not yet known.
PrimarySource recordBPS / PCEF
A current expenditure-to-outcome reconciliation is not assembled here.
PrimarySource recordBPS
Which industrial projects have received awards and begun implementation?
PrimarySource recordBPS
Final ordinance text, adoption date and compliance funding remain unresolved in this review.
PrimarySource recordProsper Portland
The summer 2026 Parcel 4A groundbreaking target has passed; completion has not been confirmed in the reviewed sources.
Current Parcel 6 financing and final permit status need a project-level update.
PrimarySource recordProsper Portland
Final adoption dates and first project-level disbursements need confirmation.
PrimarySource recordProsper Portland / OMSI
Current construction start and full infrastructure funding status need confirmation.
PrimarySource recordCED Deputy City Administrator
Final capital stack, City obligation and Keller implementation cost are not established.
PrimarySource recordArts & Culture / CED
Selected operator, final contract and transition budget are not yet confirmed.
PrimarySource recordRevenue Division / Arts & Culture
Receipt of the September 30 Framework report was not located in this review.
PrimarySource recordOffice of the City Administrator
Final documents and a fully approved City funding-source breakdown are not verified.
PrimarySource recordOffice of the City Administrator
Negotiation start date, parcel terms and final financial obligations not located.
PrimarySource recordBPS
Final Council adoption date and implementation guidance not confirmed.
PrimarySource recordBPS
The final amendment package and effective date await Council action.
PrimarySource recordBPS
Final rezoning boundaries and Council adoption timing are not set in the reviewed notice.
PrimarySource recordBPS
A precise Council hearing date has not been located.
PrimarySource recordProsper Portland
Closing date, purchase price and first operating results are not established by the release.
PrimarySource recordProsper Portland
Invited applicants and committed awards have not been located.
PrimarySource recordBPS / PP&D
Planning Commission disposition and a firm Council date need confirmation.
PrimarySource recordBPS
Final rule changes following public comment are not yet known.
PrimarySource recordPortland Children’s Levy
Latest performance results for this new grant cohort are not yet established.
PrimarySource recordArts & Culture
Award date, final recipients and actual award amounts not located.
PrimarySource recordBPS
A precise Council date and final map amendments are not confirmed.
PrimarySource recordArts & Culture
Independent validation and the consolidated completion record remain needed.
PrimarySource recordPreserved from the earlier CED research. These are dated hearing interpretations, not a claim that the same questions remain unanswered today. Current project records above take precedence.
May 7 CEDSA: Novick pressed whether the administration had identified which PCEF priorities would be displaced by a proposed $75M Moda contribution; the answer did not identify a displacement plan. Morillo, Kanal, and Green raised the weak climate nexus, CIP authority, and opportunity-cost problem.
What exact PCEF program, reserve, or future-year CIP commitment would be reduced, delayed, or reclassified to make room for the arena contribution?Original Council analysis and source context →
April 8: Smith and Dunphy flagged workforce development as a protection priority. May 7 CEDSA: Pirtle-Guiney pressed whether Prosper was preserving administrative capacity while reducing grant dollars; Avalos challenged the downtown-first ROI theory; Green asked for evidence behind downtown marketing and Clean & Safe / ESD overlap.
For each Prosper reduction, how many workers, small businesses, storefronts, or technical-assistance recipients lose direct service, and what measurable downtown return is expected instead?Original Council analysis and source context →
April 8: Zimmerman named permitting and housing capacity as core city functions. Subsequent budget discussion flagged large unbudgeted PHB housing funds as a major council deliberation topic. May 7 CEDSA kept CED accountability focused on whether housing/permitting claims connect to measurable outputs.
How many units are completed, under construction, committed but not started, or delayed, and which permitting bottleneck explains delay?Original Council analysis and source context →
May 7 CEDSA: Arts staff quantified small-grant and sponsorship reductions; the Children's Levy clarified it has no general-fund ask and no decision packages; Ryan praised the levy administrative cap and connected it to workforce/cannabis-fund collaboration.
How many grants, youth served, partner dollars, exhibitions, performances, sponsorships, or levy-funded services change under the proposed cut?Original Council analysis and source context →