Skip to content
Tom Sollitt

District 3 candidate · Portland City Council · November 3, 2026

Tom Sollitt

Branding, marketing and events professional.

Reach the campaign

Campaign finance: sources, amounts and timing ↓

In their words

Said: LET’S MAKE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BORING. That means permits get processed, streets and parks are maintained, calls and emails get answered, and when something starts going wrong, the city steps in before it becomes a bigger problem.

Pamphlet p. 53

Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; extracted September 20, 2026

Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 53 ↗

Verbatim opening of the candidate's own statement; publication by the county does not verify the claims.

The verbatim opening of their voters’ pamphlet statement, the same rule for every candidate. We chose nothing.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Wants dependable basic services and a Council that makes bureaus and contractors follow through.

  • Improve permit processing, maintenance and responsiveness.
  • Invest in gathering places, local businesses and neighborhoods.
  • Use Council oversight to coordinate service delivery.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Reliable public services
  • Community participation

His focus is making existing institutions respond and coordinate, and his emailed reply attaches a measure to each issue: homes preserved and occupied, response times and repeat calls, audit findings acted on, street condition and transit reliability. What remains open is what would pay for street maintenance if the repair fee ends.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Preserve affordable homes first
What

Would preserve existing affordable homes before adding new commitments, seek shared funding and make building conversions easier. Would keep the current renter relocation-assistance threshold.

Full position and context

Would put preserving existing affordable housing first, using current Housing Bureau staff and pressing Metro, the County, Home Forward, state and federal programs, nonprofits and private partners to share costs; would ease adaptive reuse and keep the current relocation-assistance threshold.

How
Said: Use existing Housing Bureau staff; press Metro, the County, Home Forward, state, federal and private partners to share costs; a fiscal scorecard for major investments; targeted zoning and permitting fixes brought to Council.
Measured by
Said: Units preserved or created and occupied, time from completion to occupancy, City money per unit, outside dollars leveraged, permitting time, and actual versus projected cost and schedule.

Camps, crime and who responds

Match each emergency to trained responders
What

Would send police to threats and crime, medical teams to medical calls, and non-police crisis teams to suitable welfare and mental-health calls.

Full position and context

Would define who answers which calls: police where police authority or a safety threat is involved, Fire and EMS for medical emergencies, Street Response and CHAT for behavioral-health, welfare and non-emergency calls. Counts dispatch, technology and support capacity, not only frontline headcount, as public-safety staffing.

How
Said: Within the first year, a response-allocation plan naming which calls go to police, Fire/EMS, Street Response, CHAT or County services, with the staffing, support and cost each requires; closer County work on follow-up care.
Measured by
Said: Response times, whether the right resource was sent, calls resolved in the field, connections to follow-up care, repeat calls, vacancies and turnover, and the cost of each response.

Your bills and taxes

Audit existing spending before new taxes
What

Would restore the Auditor’s capacity to check program performance, examine risky contracts and publish quarterly results before asking for more money.

Full position and context

Before asking for more money, would show existing money is used well: restore the Auditor’s performance-audit capacity in his first budget, have it examine high-risk contracts and programs, and report its recommendations and results quarterly.

How
Said: A budget amendment in his first budget restoring the Auditor’s performance-audit capacity reduced during the City’s financial crisis, aimed at high-risk contracts, programs and operations, with a quarterly public accounting of recommendations and results.
Measured by
Said: First-year benchmark: the lost audit capacity restored and a public process showing what happens to the Auditor’s findings; no fixed savings target, with savings and avoided costs reported quarterly.

Streets, buses and air

Repair existing streets before new projects
What

Would prioritize street maintenance and safety until new funding is found. Wants climate-fund transportation spending to stay within its approved purpose; changes in direction would go to voters.

Full position and context

Would maintain existing streets before committing to new projects until new funding is found, prioritizing maintenance, preservation and safety; would work with the Clean Energy Fund committee on whether voter-approved climate money can go further, within its approved purpose, toward transportation and air quality, and would take any change in direction back to voters; would restrict projects without a clear public benefit, funding source and measurable outcome.

How
Said: Within the first year, a regional transportation framework setting shared priorities, responsibilities, funding and measurable results, and work with the Clean Energy Fund committee on whether voter-approved climate money can go further toward transportation and air quality.
Measured by
Said: Street condition, transit reliability, traffic safety, air quality, user satisfaction, outside funding leveraged, and actual versus projected cost and schedule.

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 9 questions. Tom Sollitt is on record on 8, with 1 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

No answer we could find
  • Rezone the inner east side to allow apartment buildings off the main streets (the Inner Eastside Zoning Project)?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

On record
  • Public money and terms for renovating the Moda Center?

    Said: Says he would have voted no on the Moda term sheet: he wants the Blazers kept but says the City started from a weak position and should have secured a clear return, accountability and remedies.

  • When, if ever, would they raise taxes or fees?

    Said: Would strengthen oversight and scrutinize contracts before raising taxes or fees.

  • Add police officers, expand non-police responders, or both?

    Said: If Portland needs more police, says it should start with police accountability and be intentional about where positions go, and would consider strengthening detectives and specialized units; staffing should follow need, not a set number.

  • Keep funding camp removals at current levels?

    Said: Answered no, but would pause any increase or cut until a clear accounting shows what the program spends and achieves; agrees rights-of-way must stay clear and wants a more compassionate, coordinated approach with the County and providers.

  • Restrict new AI data centers in the city?

    Said: Supports restricting new AI data centers while the City sets standards for resource use, environmental impacts, infrastructure costs, community impacts and transparency; a facility meeting them with a public benefit could be considered.

  • Expand Portland Street Response to a full 24/7 role?

    Said: Supports a 24/7 Street Response eventually, but first an operational overhaul of dispatch, coverage, recruitment and retention and a way to share the cost with the County; would consider temporarily reducing hours to relieve current staff.

  • Keep the monthly street repair fee?

    Said: Would eliminate the monthly street repair fee, citing the equity of its largely flat charge for renters, transit users and lower-income households; would audit transportation obligations and seek outside and fairer revenue, naming no single replacement.

  • Raise water bills to pay for the Bull Run filtration plant and system repairs?

    Said: Would not support more water-rate increases until alternatives are exhausted, through outside funding, scrutiny of remaining costs and independent oversight; says the plant is legally required and he cannot promise increases are avoidable.

Compare every candidate

Their answers to our questions

Rent and homes

Said: On housing, I would focus first on preserving existing naturally occurring affordable housing and making better use of the resources we already have. [...] I would introduce a standardized fiscal scorecard for significant PHB investments showing the City's full contribution including direct funding, land and waived fees alongside outside funding, cost per unit, affordability and delivery schedule. [...] We should measure success through units preserved or created, units occupied, time from completion to occupancy, City contribution per occupied and/or preserved unit, outside dollars leveraged, permitting time, and actual versus projected project cost and schedule.

Received 2026-09-22

Camps, crime and who responds

Said: My approach is to clearly define who responds to what. Police should handle situations that require police authority or present a public-safety threat. Fire/EMS should handle medical emergencies. Portland Street Response and CHAT should handle appropriate behavioral-health, welfare and non-emergency calls. [...] Recent budget decisions preserved visible police and fire staffing while reducing administrative, dispatch, technology and support capacity that those responders rely on. [...] Within my first year, I would want Council to have a clear response-allocation plan identifying which calls should be handled by police, Fire/EMS, PSR, CHAT or County resources, the staffing and support capacity required to provide those services reliably, and the cost of each response.

Received 2026-09-22

Your bills and taxes

Said: Before asking Portlanders for more money, I want to demonstrate that we are using what they already give us wisely. Within my first budget, I would introduce a budget amendment to restore the Auditor's performance-audit capacity that was reduced because of the City's financial crisis. [...] I would not set an arbitrary savings target for the Auditor. [...] My first-year benchmark would be restoring the lost audit capacity and establishing a clear process for Council and the public to see what happens with the Auditor's findings.

Received 2026-09-22

Streets, buses and air

Said: My priority after becoming elected is maintaining what we already have before committing to new projects until new funding sources can be identified. [...] I would also work with the PCEF Committee to determine whether existing voter-approved climate funding can be more strategically allocated, within its approved purpose, toward transportation and air-quality needs. If the public's direction needs to change, I would take that question back to voters rather than have Council circumvent it. I would restrict spending on projects without a clear public benefit, sustainable funding source and measurable outcome.

Received 2026-09-22

Moda Center deal

Said: I would have voted no on adopting the proposed Moda Center renovation term sheet. I support keeping the Trail Blazers in Portland, but I believe the City should have started from a much stronger negotiating position. [...] Given the scale of the public investment, we should have secured a clear, material return for Portland, along with stronger accountability and remedies.

Received 2026-09-22

Clearing camps

Said: No. I would pause any discussion about increasing or reducing funding until we have a clear accounting of the program in order to right-size funding. [...] I agree that we need to keep rights-of-way clear, but this has become a contentious point for our community that has raised some legitimate concerns.

Received 2026-09-22

Data centers

Said: I support restricting new AI data centers in Portland. [...] I would support restrictions while we develop clear standards around resource use, environmental impacts, infrastructure costs, community impacts, and transparency. If a proposed facility can demonstrate that it meets those standards and provides a meaningful public benefit, that should be part of the conversation.

Received 2026-09-22

Street Response

Said: I support eventually making Portland Street Response a 24/7 service, but simply adding City funding to the existing system isn't sustainable. PSR needs an operational overhaul, including dispatch, geographic coverage, recruitment, and retention. [...] I would also consider temporarily reducing hours to alleviate the burden on current staff rather than continuing to stretch the system beyond its capacity.

Received 2026-09-22

Street repair fee

Said: I would eliminate the monthly street repair fee. [...] I don't want to pretend I have a single replacement funding source that solves this overnight. [...] This is exactly why I would want to undertake the hard work of auditing our transportation obligations, finding efficiencies, pursuing outside funding and partnerships, and identifying more equitable revenue options rather than defaulting to another fee.

Received 2026-09-22

Which measurable service targets would you put in the next budget?

Said: Before we can consider measurable service targets we need to know what we can actually afford. I can identify general areas where the city should measure, such as permitting timelines, call and response times, street and sidewalk maintenance, 311, housing and homelessness outcomes, infrastructure condition, and major project delivery. [...] Every major service should have a credible baseline, a measurable target, an accountable owner, and an identified cost. [...] Requests for additional funding should identify the capacity it would restore or add and the measurable improvement residents should expect in return.

Received 2026-09-23

Climate, transportation and environmental health

Said: I support continued investment in clean energy, energy efficiency, building electrification and climate resilience, including through the Portland Clean Energy Community Benefits Fund. [...] I support reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and addressing the risks of the Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub, especially given Portland’s earthquake risk. I also support protecting our tree canopy, restoring natural areas and waterways, including Portland Harbor, and preparing neighborhoods for extreme heat and other climate impacts. [...] Whether it is a data center or a facility like Zenith, the public should understand the energy and water use, environmental and safety risks, infrastructure costs and commitments being made. There should not be secret deals or NDAs that prevent meaningful public scrutiny.

Received 2026-09-23

Accomplishments

Said: Legendary Makers Market: In 2023, I founded and produced the event through Asian American Town, leading the concept, partnerships, programming and production. The 2023 debut started with a $0 budget, brought together more than 100 AAPI vendors, and was presented in partnership with the Portland Night Market. The event grew substantially in its second year, more than 200 vendors and partners and an estimated 35,000 attendees with support from the City of Beaverton. [...] I Hope You Get Rich: In 2025, I founded and produced Oregon’s first Asian American pitch competition inspired by Pitch Black and Pitch Latino [...] It also started with a $0 budget.

Received 2026-09-23

Water rates

Said: I would not support additional rate increases without first exhausting meaningful alternatives to reduce the burden on ratepayers. [...] I can't promise that rate increases can be avoided given the commitment the City has already made, but I can promise that I would treat reducing the burden on ratepayers as a priority and require clear, independent accountability for the remaining work.

Received 2026-09-22

Council votes

No Council vote yet. That is not a judgment about experience.

A question the evidence leaves open

If the street repair fee ends, what would pay for street maintenance until other revenue is found?

Sources (4)

  1. Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 53Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 18, 2026Written by the candidate or campaign. Publication by the county does not verify the claims.
  2. Sollitt · platform and campaign case studiesCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 18, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.
  3. Sollitt · emailed response to the Lab’s questionsCandidate statement · Received September 22, 2026Written by the candidate in reply to the Lab’s questions and kept on file; excerpts appear on the brief. Receipt does not verify the claims.
  4. Sollitt · third emailed response to the Lab’s questionsCandidate statement · Received September 23, 2026Written by the candidate in reply to the Lab’s questions and kept on file; excerpts appear on the brief. Receipt does not verify the claims.

Campaign finance

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04 · Current transaction snapshot. November–December 2024 is missing; recent filings and manual-export coverage are provisional. Reviewed candidate–committee links do not make every transaction a 2026 campaign transaction. Official account balances and editorial findings are updated separately.

Tom Sollitt for Portland City Council District 3

ORESTAR committee 24661 · Latest reported cash-contribution date: 2026-10-21.

Gross cash contributions
$43,487.00
Included City matching funds
$33,930.00
Cash excluding reviewed matches
$9,557.00
Cash-contribution records
48

Donation amounts and funding sources

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04, before refunds. Median, mean and mode cover named individual donations only. They exclude aggregate small contributions, other undisclosed sources, City matching deposits, businesses, committees, labor and candidate/family entries. We cannot calculate the median of all donations from combined records because the underlying gift amounts are unavailable. An even-sized median can have a half cent; displayed amounts round to cents.

Small contributions reported in aggregate is ORESTAR’s “Miscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under” category. The disclosure threshold applies to a contributor’s total to a committee in a calendar year; a combined row can contain many gifts and exceed $100. Other undisclosed sources are shown separately. Oregon reporting rules, pages 72–73.

Named individual size bands add all recorded gifts to each reported donor group over this window: a group giving five $25 gifts belongs in the $100.01–$1,000 band. These are conservative filing groups, not verified unique people. Aggregate rows do not reveal donor counts or individual gift sizes. Committees include known committee IDs and reported unregistered or party committees. Reported businesses are not automatically large corporations; PAC and union affiliations need separate review.

Named individual gift records
12
Median — named individual donations only
$104.00
Mean — named individual donations only
$117.33
Mode — named individual donations only
$200.00
Middle half of individual gifts
$40.00–$200.00
Smallest / largest individual gift
$15.00 / $250.00

Each mode occurs 4 times. 8 named individual groups; 1 gave $100 or less in total during this window.

This bar excludes City matching. It shows $9,557.00 in recorded cash, before refunds. City matching receipts of $33,930.00 are separate.

Cash excluding City matching: $9,557.00. Separate City matches: $33,930.00.
SourceCashShare of non-City cashRecords
Named individuals giving $100 or less in total$100.001.0%1
Named individuals giving $100.01–$1,000 in total$1,308.0013.7%11
Named individuals giving more than $1,000 in total$0.000.0%0
Reported businesses$0.000.0%0
Political committees / PACs$0.000.0%0
Reported labor organizations$0.000.0%0
Candidate / immediate family$900.009.4%3
Other named source types$0.000.0%0
Small contributions reported in aggregate$7,249.0075.9%31
Other undisclosed sources$0.000.0%0
All named source types: gift statistics

Businesses, committees, labor, self/family and other named sources are included here. City matching, aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources are excluded. This is a distribution of records, not individual people.

15 records · Median across all named source types $108.00 · Mean $153.87 · Mode $200.00 · Largest $500.00

Largest reported business, committee and labor sources

No named business, committee or labor cash contributions in these records.

Names and types follow the filings; related subsidiaries and sponsors are not consolidated.

Download these statistics (JSON) · Inspect contribution records

Every reported contribution, at a glance

Each square is one line in the filings, excluding City matching payments. Bigger squares mean more money; the scale is the same for every candidate. Gray squares show small contributions reported in aggregate; one square can contain many gifts. Hatched squares, when present, show other undisclosed sources.

15records with a reported source · $2,308.00
31Small contributions reported in aggregate · $7,249.00
$33,930.00City matching deposits · 2 records, shown separately
PersonOrganization or PACCandidate or familySmall contributions reported in aggregate
Selected record · 2026-05-31$500.00

Katherine Yoo Sollitt Koo · Candidate & Immediate Family · ORESTAR 5684486

See this reported source

Largest reported funding sources

Totals across each source’s records, before refunds. Aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources are excluded.

Top five: 67.2% of named-source cash
  1. 1 record · Candidate & Immediate Family
  2. 2 records · Candidate & Immediate Family
  3. Lisa Tran$250.00
    1 record · Individual
  4. 1 record · Individual
  5. 1 record · Individual
  6. 1 record · Individual
See the next 4 reported sources
  1. Travis Baskerville$200.001 record
  2. Sylvia Choi$150.005 records
  3. Kyle Prosen$108.001 record
  4. Daniel Brase$100.001 record
Inspect every 46 record in this view
DateReported sourceAmountORESTAR ID
2026-07-29Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $2,083.005754844
2026-08-05Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $1,485.005754848
2026-07-20Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $1,292.005732059
2026-06-24Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $510.005727364
2026-05-31Katherine Yoo Sollitt Koo$500.005684486
2026-05-02Tom Sollitt$300.005669081
2026-07-01Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $280.005727366
2026-07-20Lisa Tran$250.005732057
2026-07-15Jessie Maran$200.005727362
2026-07-15Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $200.005727373
2026-07-29Tory Morseth$200.005754814
2026-07-29Travis Baskerville$200.005754815
2026-08-19Georgia Jack$200.005801233
2026-10-21Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $185.005909743
2026-10-07Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $125.005875908
2026-05-10Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $110.005684738
2026-08-26Kyle Prosen$108.005801239
2026-01-06Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $100.005636304
2026-01-25Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $100.005663093
2026-05-12Tom Sollitt$100.005669082
2026-07-19Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $100.005738940
2026-07-20Daniel Brase$100.005732058
2026-08-19Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $79.005801285
2026-10-15Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $75.005889125
2026-05-20Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $65.005684496

A combined row may represent many gifts; it is not one donor. Reported names are not verified identities. The squares show gross receipts, not money left after refunds.

1 of 8 matched individual donor entries appear on more than one reported date. These are not confirmed counts of people.

Where the cash came from

Exclusive source categories; these rows sum to gross cash contributions.
Reported source typeCashShare of cashRecords
City matching funds (reviewed payor)$33,930.0078.0%2
Small contributions reported in aggregate$7,249.0016.7%31
Itemized individuals$1,408.003.2%12
Political committees$0.000.0%0
Business entities$0.000.0%0
Labor organizations$0.000.0%0
Candidate and immediate family$900.002.1%3
Other identified source types$0.000.0%0

Matching receipts are classified first, then aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources, then the reported source type. “Other” does not mean an individual. Generic reporting labels are not treated as donors. Types follow the filing: a union-affiliated PAC may appear under political committees, not labor organizations. This is not a reviewed economic-sector classification.

Reported geography of cash outside City matches

  • Reported Portland, Oregon$1,600.00 (16.7%)
  • Other reported Oregon locations$400.00 (4.2%)
  • Outside Oregon (reported state)$308.00 (3.2%)
  • Location unknown / aggregate$7,249.00 (75.9%)

Reported counterparty city/state on nonmatching cash receipts; aggregate categories and unrecognized states stay unknown. Portland postal locality is not a city-boundary or district-residency test. The denominator here is $9,557.00, not all cash contributions.

When receipts were reported

The largest 2026 Monday–Sunday week outside reviewed City matches was 2026-07-27–2026-08-02: $2,483.00. This describes timing, not why contributors gave.

Monthly cash, loan and noncash records

Gold bars are reviewed City matches; green bars are other cash. Each profile uses its own scale. The table supplies exact values and separate financing measures.

MonthGross cashCity matchesOther cash contributionsLoans receivedIn-kind support
2025-01$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-02$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-03$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-04$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-05$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-06$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-07$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-08$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-09$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-10$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-11$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-12$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-01$275.00$0.00$275.00$0.00$0.00
2026-02$120.00$0.00$120.00$0.00$0.00
2026-03$65.00$0.00$65.00$0.00$0.00
2026-04$60.00$0.00$60.00$0.00$0.00
2026-05$1,110.00$0.00$1,110.00$0.00$0.00
2026-06$550.00$0.00$550.00$0.00$0.00
2026-07$4,955.00$0.00$4,955.00$0.00$0.00
2026-08$34,757.00$32,780.00$1,977.00$0.00$0.00
2026-09$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-10$1,595.00$1,150.00$445.00$0.00$0.00
2026-11$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00

Other financing and cash uses

Cash payments
$19,822.96

These are separate measures, not amounts to add to fundraising. Loans are financing, in-kind support is noncash, and refunds are not new receipts. Payables are not added to their subsequent payments.

All recorded accounting measures
Accounting basisReported amountRecords
cash contribution$43,487.0048
cash payment$19,822.9674
obligation$790.002

No combined total is shown: cash movements, obligations, cancellations and adjustments answer different accounting questions.

Current official cash-on-hand and debt balances have not been reconciled to this transaction snapshot. Payments do not tell us how much cash is left without a verified opening balance.