Skip to content
Jamey Evenstar

District 4 candidate · Portland City Council · November 3, 2026

Jamey Evenstar

City Council chief of staff, policy director and analyst; renter and transit rider.

Campaign finance: sources, amounts and timing ↓

In their words

Said: It’s time we had a City Council that believes in Portland. We need more working-class voices on Council to stand up to a fascist regime, have a backbone against special monied interests, and refuse to accept the status quo.

Pamphlet p. 64

Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; extracted September 20, 2026

Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 64 ↗

Verbatim opening of the candidate's own statement; publication by the county does not verify the claims.

The verbatim opening of their voters’ pamphlet statement, the same rule for every candidate. We chose nothing.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Argues for progressive leadership grounded in housing stability and more accessible transportation.

  • Build on work on tenant protections and housing access.
  • Make buses faster and easier to use.
  • Defend residents against federal overreach and concentrated financial influence.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Housing stability
  • Accessible transportation

Evenstar’s platform treats housing and transport costs as linked barriers to staying in Portland. Social housing and improved transit need financing, and city spending cannot alone determine regional fares or service levels.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Finance more homes; protect renters
What

Proposes a fund to build and preserve affordable homes, faster permits, and a fee on homes that are not primary residences. Also proposes renter purchase rights and limits on application fees.

Full position and context

His Community Housing Plan proposes low-cost construction financing, faster permits for pre-approved plans, more housing near transit and a fee on homes that are not primary residences. He would seed a housing fund with an existing $17.5 million, the new fee and a larger share of urban-renewal money. The plan also proposes renter purchase rights, a 5% relocation-assistance trigger and a $10 application-fee cap. These are proposals, not adopted rules.

Earlier sourced position: Would establish a foundation for permanently affordable social housing and housing stability.

How
Said: Would seed a Portland Community Housing Fund with the existing $17.5M plus a new Housing Supply Impact Fee on non-primary residences, raise urban-renewal housing share from 45% to 75%, and use PCEF dollars.
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Camps, crime and who responds

Expand non-police crisis response
What

Supports more unarmed crisis response and stronger mental-health services from the state and county.

Full position and context

Supports expanded unarmed crisis response and stronger state and county mental-health services.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Your bills and taxes

Earlier budgets; residents choose some spending
What

Supports earlier, clearer budgets and letting residents decide some spending. Also favors worker-owned businesses and investment in neighborhood business districts.

Full position and context

Favors earlier transparent budgets, participatory budgeting, worker-owned businesses and investment across commercial corridors.

How
Said: Would give Council independent staff capacity for budget oversight, address top-heavy management and executive pay, and back the participatory-budgeting initiative for a share of general-fund spending.
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Streets, buses and air

Cheaper youth fares; dedicated bus lanes
What

Proposes cheaper transit for people under 25, buses separated from traffic and more transit in Southwest Portland. Climate protections would focus on vulnerable residents.

Full position and context

Proposes lower-cost transit for people under 25, buses separated from traffic, more southwest transit options and climate resilience focused on vulnerable residents.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 9 questions. Jamey Evenstar is on record on 4, with 5 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

No answer we could find
  • Add police officers, expand non-police responders, or both?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep funding camp removals at current levels?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Restrict new AI data centers in the city?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep the monthly street repair fee?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Raise water bills to pay for the Bull Run filtration plant and system repairs?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

On record
  • Rezone the inner east side to allow apartment buildings off the main streets (the Inner Eastside Zoning Project)?

    Said: Yes; calls the inner east side ideal for upzoning given its amenities, and says she was part of the council office that worked with the group on the April resolution that sped up the project.

  • Public money and terms for renovating the Moda Center?

    Said: Called the original Moda term sheet a terrible deal and the August 12 amendments a big improvement; other posts ask for Albina community benefits and escalating rent; she does not say whether public money should go in.

    On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.

  • When, if ever, would they raise taxes or fees?

    Said: Proposes a Housing Supply Impact Fee on homes not used as a primary residence, with revenue building permanently affordable homes.

  • Expand Portland Street Response to a full 24/7 role?

    Said: Would expand unarmed crisis response for behavioral-health and quality-of-life calls and, in a July post, backed approving a lease for Portland Street Response; she does not say whether it should run 24/7 citywide.

    On the topic; the exact choice is unsaid.

Compare every candidate

Council votes

No Council vote yet. That is not a judgment about experience.

A question the evidence leaves open

Which tenant protections and bus improvements would you introduce first?

Sources (4)

  1. Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 64Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 18, 2026Written by the candidate or campaign. Publication by the county does not verify the claims.
  2. Portland: Neighbors Welcome 2026 endorsement questionnaire · Jamey Evenstar’s responsesCandidate statement · Responses posted September 22, 2026; reviewed October 14, 2026The candidate’s own written answers, published by a group that endorses in this race. Campaign position; claimed results have not been independently verified.
  3. Evenstar · six-part platformCandidate statement · Website reviewed September 18, 2026Campaign position. Claimed results and numerical premises have not automatically been independently verified.
  4. Jamey Evenstar · Community Housing PlanCandidate statement · Accessed November 2, 2026The candidate’s stated proposal, not a verified outcome or an endorsement. An undated page does not establish when the position was first adopted.

Campaign finance

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04 · Current transaction snapshot. November–December 2024 is missing; recent filings and manual-export coverage are provisional. Reviewed candidate–committee links do not make every transaction a 2026 campaign transaction. Official account balances and editorial findings are updated separately.

Evenstar for Portland

ORESTAR committee 25040 · Latest reported cash-contribution date: 2026-11-01.

Gross cash contributions
$85,541.47
Included City matching funds
$60,080.00
Cash excluding reviewed matches
$25,461.47
Cash-contribution records
180

Donation amounts and funding sources

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04, before refunds. Median, mean and mode cover named individual donations only. They exclude aggregate small contributions, other undisclosed sources, City matching deposits, businesses, committees, labor and candidate/family entries. We cannot calculate the median of all donations from combined records because the underlying gift amounts are unavailable. An even-sized median can have a half cent; displayed amounts round to cents.

Small contributions reported in aggregate is ORESTAR’s “Miscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under” category. The disclosure threshold applies to a contributor’s total to a committee in a calendar year; a combined row can contain many gifts and exceed $100. Other undisclosed sources are shown separately. Oregon reporting rules, pages 72–73.

Named individual size bands add all recorded gifts to each reported donor group over this window: a group giving five $25 gifts belongs in the $100.01–$1,000 band. These are conservative filing groups, not verified unique people. Aggregate rows do not reveal donor counts or individual gift sizes. Committees include known committee IDs and reported unregistered or party committees. Reported businesses are not automatically large corporations; PAC and union affiliations need separate review.

Named individual gift records
55
Median — named individual donations only
$150.00
Mean — named individual donations only
$169.31
Mode — named individual donations only
$100.00
Middle half of individual gifts
$50.00–$275.00
Smallest / largest individual gift
$5.00 / $500.00

Each mode occurs 9 times. 36 named individual groups; 11 gave $100 or less in total during this window.

This bar excludes City matching. It shows $25,461.47 in recorded cash, before refunds. City matching receipts of $60,080.00 are separate.

Cash excluding City matching: $25,461.47. Separate City matches: $60,080.00.
SourceCashShare of non-City cashRecords
Named individuals giving $100 or less in total$700.002.7%12
Named individuals giving $100.01–$1,000 in total$8,612.0033.8%43
Named individuals giving more than $1,000 in total$0.000.0%0
Reported businesses$0.000.0%0
Political committees / PACs$0.000.0%0
Reported labor organizations$0.000.0%0
Candidate / immediate family$1,500.005.9%2
Other named source types$0.000.0%0
Small contributions reported in aggregate$14,649.4757.5%120
Other undisclosed sources$0.000.0%0
All named source types: gift statistics

Businesses, committees, labor, self/family and other named sources are included here. City matching, aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources are excluded. This is a distribution of records, not individual people.

57 records · Median across all named source types $150.00 · Mean $189.68 · Mode $100.00 · Largest $750.00

Largest reported business, committee and labor sources

No named business, committee or labor cash contributions in these records.

Names and types follow the filings; related subsidiaries and sponsors are not consolidated.

Download these statistics (JSON) · Inspect contribution records

Every reported contribution, at a glance

Each square is one line in the filings, excluding City matching payments. Bigger squares mean more money; the scale is the same for every candidate. Gray squares show small contributions reported in aggregate; one square can contain many gifts. Hatched squares, when present, show other undisclosed sources.

57records with a reported source · $10,812.00
120Small contributions reported in aggregate · $14,649.47
$60,080.00City matching deposits · 3 records, shown separately
PersonOrganization or PACCandidate or familySmall contributions reported in aggregate
Selected record · 2026-05-22$750.00

Mary Duhamel · Candidate & Immediate Family · ORESTAR 5677929

See this reported source

Largest reported funding sources

Totals across each source’s records, before refunds. Aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources are excluded.

Top five: 35.1% of named-source cash
  1. Julie Donn$900.00
    3 records · Individual
  2. 8 records · Individual
  3. 1 record · Candidate & Immediate Family
  4. 1 record · Candidate & Immediate Family
  5. 3 records · Individual
  6. 2 records · Individual
See the next 4 reported sources
  1. Marisa DeMull$500.002 records
  2. Mignon Leins$500.002 records
  3. Paterno Escarilla$500.001 record
  4. Andres Oswill$350.001 record
Inspect every 177 record in this view
DateReported sourceAmountORESTAR ID
2026-05-22Mary Duhamel$750.005677929
2026-05-22John Duhamel$750.005677930
2026-07-16Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $575.005729046
2026-05-16Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $550.005666227
2026-05-21Paterno Escarilla$500.005677928
2026-07-01Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $480.005709060
2026-10-07Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $480.005869647
2026-05-19Lisa Freeman$475.005672947
2026-10-19Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $401.005891250
2026-09-17Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $387.775814737
2026-05-22Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $370.005672944
2026-05-16Andres Oswill$350.005666200
2026-05-16Marisa DeMull$350.005666201
2026-05-16Anthony Russell$350.005666213
2026-05-16Mignon Leins$350.005672884
2026-06-04Julie Donn$350.005683787
2026-07-22John Schroeder$350.005738248
2026-10-14Kevin Kincaid$350.005880570
2026-10-20Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $335.005903499
2026-05-19Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $330.005672940
2026-07-16Jonathan Pulvers$325.005729014
2026-10-22Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $320.005908733
2026-07-16Margot Black$300.005729016
2026-07-17Helena Birecki$300.005729031
2026-09-26Jerold Howard$300.005833150

A combined row may represent many gifts; it is not one donor. Reported names are not verified identities. The squares show gross receipts, not money left after refunds.

7 of 36 matched individual donor entries appear on more than one reported date. These are not confirmed counts of people.

Where the cash came from

Exclusive source categories; these rows sum to gross cash contributions.
Reported source typeCashShare of cashRecords
City matching funds (reviewed payor)$60,080.0070.2%3
Small contributions reported in aggregate$14,649.4717.1%120
Itemized individuals$9,312.0010.9%55
Political committees$0.000.0%0
Business entities$0.000.0%0
Labor organizations$0.000.0%0
Candidate and immediate family$1,500.001.8%2
Other identified source types$0.000.0%0

Matching receipts are classified first, then aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources, then the reported source type. “Other” does not mean an individual. Generic reporting labels are not treated as donors. Types follow the filing: a union-affiliated PAC may appear under political committees, not labor organizations. This is not a reviewed economic-sector classification.

Reported geography of cash outside City matches

  • Reported Portland, Oregon$4,740.00 (18.6%)
  • Other reported Oregon locations$552.00 (2.2%)
  • Outside Oregon (reported state)$5,520.00 (21.7%)
  • Location unknown / aggregate$14,649.47 (57.5%)

Reported counterparty city/state on nonmatching cash receipts; aggregate categories and unrecognized states stay unknown. Portland postal locality is not a city-boundary or district-residency test. The denominator here is $25,461.47, not all cash contributions.

When receipts were reported

The largest 2026 Monday–Sunday week outside reviewed City matches was 2026-05-18–2026-05-24: $4,623.00. This describes timing, not why contributors gave.

Monthly cash, loan and noncash records

Gold bars are reviewed City matches; green bars are other cash. Each profile uses its own scale. The table supplies exact values and separate financing measures.

MonthGross cashCity matchesOther cash contributionsLoans receivedIn-kind support
2025-01$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-02$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-03$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-04$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-05$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-06$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-07$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-08$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-09$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-10$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-11$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-12$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-01$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-02$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-03$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-04$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-05$8,508.00$0.00$8,508.00$0.00$0.00
2026-06$2,454.00$0.00$2,454.00$0.00$0.00
2026-07$6,344.70$0.00$6,344.70$0.00$0.00
2026-08$48,970.00$47,460.00$1,510.00$0.00$0.00
2026-09$7,902.77$5,150.00$2,752.77$0.00$0.00
2026-10$11,312.00$7,470.00$3,842.00$0.00$272.49
2026-11$50.00$0.00$50.00$0.00$0.00

Other financing and cash uses

Cash payments
$80,429.95

These are separate measures, not amounts to add to fundraising. Loans are financing, in-kind support is noncash, and refunds are not new receipts. Payables are not added to their subsequent payments.

All recorded accounting measures
Accounting basisReported amountRecords
cash contribution$85,541.47180
cash payment$80,429.95183
contribution refund$25.001
noncash support$272.491
obligation$3,417.057
other cash receipt$0.444

No combined total is shown: cash movements, obligations, cancellations and adjustments answer different accounting questions.

Current official cash-on-hand and debt balances have not been reconciled to this transaction snapshot. Payments do not tell us how much cash is left without a verified opening balance.