Skip to content
Jayne Cronlund

District 4 candidate · Portland City Council · November 3, 2026

Jayne Cronlund

Small-business owner and former conservation nonprofit executive.

Campaign finance: sources, amounts and timing ↓

In their words

Said: I am a listener and an experienced coach that helps people find solutions to their toughest challenges.

Pamphlet p. 63

Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; extracted September 20, 2026

Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 63 ↗

Verbatim opening of the candidate's own statement; publication by the county does not verify the claims.

The verbatim opening of their voters’ pamphlet statement, the same rule for every candidate. We chose nothing.

What they say they would do

Our summary of their platform, in our words

Emphasizes collaboration, living-wage jobs and shared public spaces.

  • Support jobs in Portland’s creative and sustainable economy.
  • Invest in parks, trails, natural areas and business districts.
  • Set shared government goals and regularly report results.

Our reading

Our interpretation, not their words
  • Shared public spaces
  • Collaborative development

Her program emphasizes places and partnerships that support community life and jobs. The reviewed statement leaves the harder funding and housing choices open; collaboration alone does not resolve competing budget claims.

Where they stand

Rent and homes

Convert offices; oversee housing providers
What

Would explore converting vacant offices to homes and require nonprofit housing partners to manage money lawfully, fill homes and protect residents and neighbors.

Full position and context

Would advocate for the Housing Bureau to hold its nonprofit partners accountable (lawful spending within budget, existing housing full, residents cared for, neighbors safe) and would have the permitting bureau explore streamlining conversions of vacant downtown offices to housing for willing owners, citing 37% office vacancy.

How
Said: Direct the permitting bureau to streamline conversions of vacant downtown offices to housing for willing owners, and have the Housing Bureau check nonprofit partners’ spending, occupancy and resident care.
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Camps, crime and who responds

More police tied to faster response
What

Supports a modest police increase if response times improve, and stronger oversight of nonprofit housing providers.

Full position and context

Supports a modest increase in police if it is tied to shorter response times, and wants homelessness addressed through the Housing Bureau and the permitting bureau, with stronger oversight of nonprofit housing providers.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Your bills and taxes

Jobs with wages people can live on
What

Supports living-wage jobs, creative and sustainable businesses, and regular reports on shared government goals.

Full position and context

Supports living-wage jobs, the creative and sustainable economy, and regular reporting on shared government goals.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Not found in the reviewed sources

Streets, buses and air

Protect parks, trails and natural areas
What

Prioritizes parks, trails, natural areas and neighborhood business districts.

Full position and context

Prioritizes parks, trails, natural areas and business districts.

How
Not found in the reviewed sources
Measured by
Said: A 35% cut in the $800 million parks maintenance backlog without new taxes or reduced access, with progress reported to voters.

The choices this office faces

Every candidate in this race is asked the same 9 questions. Jayne Cronlund is on record on 2, with 7 still open. A question without an answer is a research gap, not a position.

No answer we could find
  • Rezone the inner east side to allow apartment buildings off the main streets (the Inner Eastside Zoning Project)?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • When, if ever, would they raise taxes or fees?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep funding camp removals at current levels?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Restrict new AI data centers in the city?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Expand Portland Street Response to a full 24/7 role?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Keep the monthly street repair fee?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

  • Raise water bills to pay for the Bull Run filtration plant and system repairs?

    Nothing on this exact choice in the sources we reviewed.

On record
  • Public money and terms for renovating the Moda Center?

    Said: Lists Moda Center renovations among spending she would prioritize, for short-term prevailing-wage construction jobs and as a centerpiece for the Albina Vision Trust’s restorative development.

  • Add police officers, expand non-police responders, or both?

    Said: Supports a modest increase in police if it is tied to decreasing response times.

Compare every candidate

Their answers to our questions

What spending would you prioritize or reduce to sustain public-space investment?

Said: Sustain investment in our public parks and reduce the backlog of maintenance without reducing access. I propose a careful approach to achieving 35% reduction in the $800 million backlog without new taxes. I will advocate for clear reporting back to the voters on progress toward this goal. I support a modest increase in police if tied to decreasing response time. Moda Center renovations to secure short term, prevailing wage construction jobs and provide a centerpiece from which restorative development proposed in the Albina Vision Trust may succeed. [...] I will allocate funds from my office budget to support a City Hall led planning process.

Received 2026-09-23

Housing affordability and production; public safety and homelessness

Said: I will advocate for Portland Housing Bureau to exercise greater oversight and accountability for its nonprofit partners, including 1) ensuring that nonprofit expenses are legal and within budget, 2) existing housing is full to capacity, 3) residents are cared for and 4) neighbors feel safe around these affordable housing properties. I would direct Bureau of Development Services to explore how we could streamline downtown office vacancy to housing for willing property owners. Office vacancy downtown is at 37%.

Received 2026-09-23

Accomplishments

Said: While I was executive director of Three Rivers Land Conservancy, I championed and created the organizational foundation of the Backyard Habitat Certification program. The pilot program lasted for 4 years under Three Rivers before it was transferred to Audubon and Columbia Land Trust. [...] While working at Greenline Fine Woodworking with my husband on our small family business, I acted as business manager from 2010 through the end of 2023. [...] One of our significant accomplishments was restoring a private residence called Firehouse 17. This property and Greenline received a Restore Oregon DeMuro award in 2019.

Received 2026-09-23

Council votes

No Council vote yet. That is not a judgment about experience.

A question the evidence leaves open

How would the parks maintenance backlog shrink 35% without new taxes, and over what period?

Sources (2)

  1. Multnomah County voters’ pamphlet · PDF page 63Candidate statement · November 2026 edition; reviewed September 18, 2026Written by the candidate or campaign. Publication by the county does not verify the claims.
  2. Cronlund · emailed response to the Lab’s questionsCandidate statement · Received September 23, 2026Written by the candidate in reply to the Lab’s questions and kept on file; excerpts appear on the brief. Receipt does not verify the claims.

Campaign finance

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04 · Current transaction snapshot. November–December 2024 is missing; recent filings and manual-export coverage are provisional. Reviewed candidate–committee links do not make every transaction a 2026 campaign transaction. Official account balances and editorial findings are updated separately.

Friends of Jayne for Portland

ORESTAR committee 25103 · Latest reported cash-contribution date: 2026-10-21.

Gross cash contributions
$59,807.00
Included City matching funds
$43,070.00
Cash excluding reviewed matches
$16,737.00
Cash-contribution records
92

Donation amounts and funding sources

January 1, 2025–2026-11-04, before refunds. Median, mean and mode cover named individual donations only. They exclude aggregate small contributions, other undisclosed sources, City matching deposits, businesses, committees, labor and candidate/family entries. We cannot calculate the median of all donations from combined records because the underlying gift amounts are unavailable. An even-sized median can have a half cent; displayed amounts round to cents.

Small contributions reported in aggregate is ORESTAR’s “Miscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under” category. The disclosure threshold applies to a contributor’s total to a committee in a calendar year; a combined row can contain many gifts and exceed $100. Other undisclosed sources are shown separately. Oregon reporting rules, pages 72–73.

Named individual size bands add all recorded gifts to each reported donor group over this window: a group giving five $25 gifts belongs in the $100.01–$1,000 band. These are conservative filing groups, not verified unique people. Aggregate rows do not reveal donor counts or individual gift sizes. Committees include known committee IDs and reported unregistered or party committees. Reported businesses are not automatically large corporations; PAC and union affiliations need separate review.

Named individual gift records
33
Median — named individual donations only
$250.00
Mean — named individual donations only
$232.58
Mode — named individual donations only
$250.00
Middle half of individual gifts
$100.00–$250.00
Smallest / largest individual gift
$25.00 / $875.00

Each mode occurs 11 times. 27 named individual groups; 5 gave $100 or less in total during this window.

This bar excludes City matching. It shows $16,737.00 in recorded cash, before refunds. City matching receipts of $43,070.00 are separate.

Cash excluding City matching: $16,737.00. Separate City matches: $43,070.00.
SourceCashShare of non-City cashRecords
Named individuals giving $100 or less in total$425.002.5%5
Named individuals giving $100.01–$1,000 in total$7,250.0043.3%28
Named individuals giving more than $1,000 in total$0.000.0%0
Reported businesses$0.000.0%0
Political committees / PACs$0.000.0%0
Reported labor organizations$0.000.0%0
Candidate / immediate family$0.000.0%0
Other named source types$0.000.0%0
Small contributions reported in aggregate$9,062.0054.1%56
Other undisclosed sources$0.000.0%0
All named source types: gift statistics

Businesses, committees, labor, self/family and other named sources are included here. City matching, aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources are excluded. This is a distribution of records, not individual people.

33 records · Median across all named source types $250.00 · Mean $232.58 · Mode $250.00 · Largest $875.00

Largest reported business, committee and labor sources

No named business, committee or labor cash contributions in these records.

Names and types follow the filings; related subsidiaries and sponsors are not consolidated.

Download these statistics (JSON) · Inspect contribution records

Every reported contribution, at a glance

Each square is one line in the filings, excluding City matching payments. Bigger squares mean more money; the scale is the same for every candidate. Gray squares show small contributions reported in aggregate; one square can contain many gifts. Hatched squares, when present, show other undisclosed sources.

33records with a reported source · $7,675.00
56Small contributions reported in aggregate · $9,062.00
$43,070.00City matching deposits · 3 records, shown separately
PersonOrganization or PACCandidate or familySmall contributions reported in aggregate
Selected record · 2026-07-18$875.00

Sue Marshall · Individual · ORESTAR 5759015

See this reported source

Largest reported funding sources

Totals across each source’s records, before refunds. Aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources are excluded.

Top five: 37.5% of named-source cash
  1. 1 record · Individual
  2. Amy Beacom$500.00
    1 record · Individual
  3. 2 records · Individual
  4. 1 record · Individual
  5. 1 record · Individual
  6. 3 records · Individual
See the next 4 reported sources
  1. Amy Reed$350.002 records
  2. Erin Moran$350.001 record
  3. James Beck$350.001 record
  4. Anne Miller$275.002 records
Inspect every 89 record in this view
DateReported sourceAmountORESTAR ID
2026-07-28Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $1,242.005760339
2026-07-18Sue Marshall$875.005759015
2026-07-27Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $770.005760338
2026-07-23Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $650.005760332
2026-07-15Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $640.005760321
2026-07-26Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $555.005760336
2026-07-25Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $505.005760335
2026-07-16Tamara Banker$500.005758998
2026-07-22Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $500.005760330
2026-07-28Gary Banker$500.005759284
2026-07-28Amy Beacom$500.005759285
2026-07-21Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $450.005760329
2026-09-10James Beck$350.005831765
2026-09-13Erin Moran$350.005831777
2026-07-14Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $335.005760318
2026-07-28Andrea Kappa$325.005768127
2026-09-09Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $310.005802220
2026-07-20Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $265.005760328
2026-09-17Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $265.005831846
2026-09-14Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $260.005831842
2026-07-16Small contributions reported in aggregateMiscellaneous Cash Contributions $100 and under $255.005760322
2026-07-16Michael Miller$250.005758999
2026-07-17Anne Miller$250.005759004
2026-07-20Misty Ibsen$250.005759202
2026-07-24Amy Reed$250.005759113

A combined row may represent many gifts; it is not one donor. Reported names are not verified identities. The squares show gross receipts, not money left after refunds.

4 of 27 matched individual donor entries appear on more than one reported date. These are not confirmed counts of people.

Where the cash came from

Exclusive source categories; these rows sum to gross cash contributions.
Reported source typeCashShare of cashRecords
City matching funds (reviewed payor)$43,070.0072.0%3
Small contributions reported in aggregate$9,062.0015.2%56
Itemized individuals$7,675.0012.8%33
Political committees$0.000.0%0
Business entities$0.000.0%0
Labor organizations$0.000.0%0
Candidate and immediate family$0.000.0%0
Other identified source types$0.000.0%0

Matching receipts are classified first, then aggregate small contributions and other undisclosed sources, then the reported source type. “Other” does not mean an individual. Generic reporting labels are not treated as donors. Types follow the filing: a union-affiliated PAC may appear under political committees, not labor organizations. This is not a reviewed economic-sector classification.

Reported geography of cash outside City matches

  • Reported Portland, Oregon$4,075.00 (24.3%)
  • Other reported Oregon locations$825.00 (4.9%)
  • Outside Oregon (reported state)$2,775.00 (16.6%)
  • Location unknown / aggregate$9,062.00 (54.1%)

Reported counterparty city/state on nonmatching cash receipts; aggregate categories and unrecognized states stay unknown. Portland postal locality is not a city-boundary or district-residency test. The denominator here is $16,737.00, not all cash contributions.

When receipts were reported

The largest 2026 Monday–Sunday week outside reviewed City matches was 2026-07-20–2026-07-26: $3,835.00. This describes timing, not why contributors gave.

Monthly cash, loan and noncash records

Gold bars are reviewed City matches; green bars are other cash. Each profile uses its own scale. The table supplies exact values and separate financing measures.

MonthGross cashCity matchesOther cash contributionsLoans receivedIn-kind support
2025-01$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-02$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-03$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-04$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-05$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-06$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-07$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-08$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-09$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-10$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-11$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2025-12$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-01$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-02$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-03$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-04$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-05$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-06$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
2026-07$11,002.00$0.00$11,002.00$0.00$10.00
2026-08$40,250.00$39,720.00$530.00$0.00$0.00
2026-09$6,585.00$1,800.00$4,785.00$0.00$100.00
2026-10$1,970.00$1,550.00$420.00$0.00$0.00
2026-11$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00

Other financing and cash uses

Cash payments
$42,743.47

These are separate measures, not amounts to add to fundraising. Loans are financing, in-kind support is noncash, and refunds are not new receipts. Payables are not added to their subsequent payments.

All recorded accounting measures
Accounting basisReported amountRecords
cash contribution$59,807.0092
cash payment$42,743.4770
noncash support$110.002
obligation$3,583.2550
other cash receipt$78.994

No combined total is shown: cash movements, obligations, cancellations and adjustments answer different accounting questions.

Current official cash-on-hand and debt balances have not been reconciled to this transaction snapshot. Payments do not tell us how much cash is left without a verified opening balance.