DCA cockpits

Service-Area Cockpit

Community & Economic Development

This page turns the CED scorecard into a work-session operating cockpit: permitting, housing, PCEF, economic development, arts/youth, and spectator venues all in one source-backed view.

Core question

Can CED connect budget asks and public narratives to measurable outputs and outcomes, or are major decisions still being made without operational proof?

01

Start

Read this first

Start with the six CED lanes, then open the lane tied to the work session, policy question, or budget request.

02

Interpret

Why it matters

CED spans high-stakes areas where activity counts can hide whether the city is actually delivering housing, permits, climate outcomes, and economic benefit.

03

Act

Scroll for

Metrics by vertical, data-gap candidates, budget questions, and spectator-venue gaps.

Continue down
Turn into council prep

May 7 CEDSA hearing map

CED questions Council actually asked

The CED page should not just show a portfolio. It should help staff answer the live work-session issues: PCEF/Moda displacement, Prosper workforce cuts, downtown ROI, housing/permitting evidence, and arts/children grant tradeoffs.

Open one issue before the hearing, then use the linked official source packets to separate what Performance Portland can prove from what still needs follow-up data.

Open full council issue map

Work-session issue

PCEF / Moda opportunity cost

May 7 CEDSA: Novick pressed whether the administration had identified which PCEF priorities would be displaced by a proposed $75M Moda contribution; the answer did not identify a displacement plan. Morillo, Kanal, and Green raised the weak climate nexus, CIP authority, and opportunity-cost problem.

What exact PCEF program, reserve, or future-year CIP commitment would be reduced, delayed, or reclassified to make room for the arena contribution?

Work-session issue

Prosper Portland workforce cuts and downtown ROI

April 8: Smith and Dunphy flagged workforce development as a protection priority. May 7 CEDSA: Pirtle-Guiney pressed whether Prosper was preserving administrative capacity while reducing grant dollars; Avalos challenged the downtown-first ROI theory; Green asked for evidence behind downtown marketing and Clean & Safe / ESD overlap.

For each Prosper reduction, how many workers, small businesses, storefronts, or technical-assistance recipients lose direct service, and what measurable downtown return is expected instead?

Work-session issue

Housing, permitting, and unbudgeted housing funds

April 8: Zimmerman named permitting and housing capacity as core city functions. Subsequent budget discussion flagged large unbudgeted PHB housing funds as a major council deliberation topic. May 7 CEDSA kept CED accountability focused on whether housing/permitting claims connect to measurable outputs.

How many units are completed, under construction, committed but not started, or delayed, and which permitting bottleneck explains delay?

Work-session issue

Arts, Children's Levy, and grant-accountability tradeoffs

May 7 CEDSA: Arts staff quantified small-grant and sponsorship reductions; the Children's Levy clarified it has no general-fund ask and no decision packages; Ryan praised the levy administrative cap and connected it to workforce/cannabis-fund collaboration.

How many grants, youth served, partner dollars, exhibitions, performances, sponsorships, or levy-funded services change under the proposed cut?

CED service area

Arts / Children / Youth

Connect grants and dollars to public benefit outputs for cultural and youth programs.

0 data-gap candidates

Budget questions

Which grants have output measures and which only report dollars?

How many youth are served, and what outcome follows service?

What should council ask before protecting or expanding these funds?

CED service area

Spectator Venues / Moda

Track public subsidy, community benefits, lease/funding status, and PCEF exposure.

0 data-gap candidates

No direct official metric found

The official Performance Portland scorecards do not yet expose a direct metric for this lane. That should be treated as a data gap, not as evidence that the issue is unimportant.

Track as data gap

Budget questions

Which public costs are visible in the budget but absent from official performance metrics?

What enforceable community benefit is tied to a measurable output?

Is any climate or PCEF exposure being described without a performance measure?

Spectator venues / Moda note

The official CED scorecard does not yet provide a clean spectator-venue or Moda performance measure. That absence is itself a data gap: public subsidy, enforceable community benefits, lease/funding status, and climate/PCEF exposure need measurable public outputs before council can evaluate tradeoffs.

Convert this into council questions